Physical and Mechanical Properties of Fired Clay Bricks Incorporated with Cigarette Butts: Comparison between Slow and Fast Heating Rates

Article Preview

Abstract:

In general, firing process in brick manufacturing could affect the properties, colours and appearance of the brick. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different heating rates on physical and mechanical properties during the firing of standard bricks and bricks incorporated with cigarette butt (CB). In this investigation, two different heating rates were used: slow heating rate (2oC min-1) and fast heating rate (5oC min-1). Samples were fired in solid forms from room temperature to 1050oC. All bricks were tested for their physical and mechanical properties including compressive strength, initial rate of absorption and density. Higher heating rates decrease compressive strength value but slightly increase the initial rate of absorption and density properties respectively. In conclusion, higher heating rates are able to produce adequate physical and mechanical properties especially for CB Brick.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

201-204

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.L. Rasmussen, G.A. De La Fuente, A.D. Bond, K.K. Matheesen and S.D. Vera: Pottery firing temperatures: a new method for determining the firing temperature of ceramics and burnt clay, Journal of Archaeological Science Vol. 39 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.008

Google Scholar

[2] A.C. Duhham, A.S. McKnight and I. Warren: Mineral assemblages formed in Oxford Clay fired under different time-temperature conditions with reference to brick manufacture, Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society Vol. 53 (3), (2001).

DOI: 10.1144/pygs.53.3.221

Google Scholar

[3] M. Dondi, M. Marsigli and I. Venturi: Microstructure and mechanical properties of clay bricks: comparison between fast firing and traditional firing, Brit. Ceram. Trans. Vol. 98 (1), 1999, pp.12-18.

DOI: 10.1179/bct.1999.98.1.12

Google Scholar

[4] C.M. Chan: Effect of Natural Fibres Inclusion in Clay Bricks: Physico–Mechanical Properties, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, (2011), pp.51-57.

Google Scholar

[5] B.E.E. Hegazy, H.A. Fouad and A.M. Hassanain: Brick Manufacturing from Water Treatment Sludge and Rice Husk Ash, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6(3), (2012), pp.453-461.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Lertwattanaruk and J. Choksiriwanna: The Physical and Thermal Properties of Adobe Brick Containing Baggase for Earth Construction, Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, Vol. 5(1), (2011), pp.187-199.

DOI: 10.56261/built.v1.170319

Google Scholar

[7] A. Abdul Kadir and A.A. Mohajerani: Recycling cigarette butts in light-weight fired clay bricks, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (UK). Vol. 164 (5), (2011), pp.210-229.

DOI: 10.1680/coma.900013

Google Scholar

[8] Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS. Method 1 4456. 1 (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] Australian/New Zealand Standards AS/NZS 3700: 2001. Masonry structures (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] Information on from http: /www. electronicblueprint. com. au/specifications/12MASONRY. doc. The Premier Building Specification, Detailing and Training Reference.

Google Scholar

[11] W.H. Arnold, S.R. Davies, G.P. Sinha and B.P. Sinha: Design of Masonry Structures. Taylor & Francis, (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] Australian/New Zealand Standards AS/NZS 4455. 1: 2008. Masonry units, pavers, flags and segmental retaining wall units-Masonry units (2008).

Google Scholar