Weight Selection and PSO Based Three-Dimensional Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

Localization is one of the key technologies of wireless sensor networks, and the problem of localization is always formulated as an optimization problem. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is easy to implement and requires moderate computing resources, which is feasible for localization of sensor networks. To improve the efficiency and precision of PSO-based localization methods, this paper proposes a novel three-dimensional PSO method based on weight selection (WSPSO). Simulation results show that the proposed method outperforms standard PSO and existing localization algorithms.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2540-2544

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yunhao Liu, Zheng Yang, Xiaoping Wang. Location localization and localizability[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 2010. 5, 25(2): 274-297.

Google Scholar

[2] G. F. Nan, M. Q. Li, and J. Li, Estimation of node localization with a real-coded genetic algorithm in WSNs,. in Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning and Cybern, pp.873-878, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2007.4370265

Google Scholar

[3] M. Marks, and E. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, Two-phase stochastic optimization to sensor network localization,. in Proc. Int. Conf. Sensor Techn. and App, pp.134-139, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/sensorcomm.2007.4394910

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Zhang, J. Huang, J. Wang, C. Jin, J. Ye, and W. Zhang et al., A two-phase localization algorithm for wireless sensor network, in Proc. Int. Conf. Info. Autom., pp.59-64, (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] N. M. A. Latiff,C. C. Tsimenidis,B. S. Sharif. Performance comparison of optimization algorithms for clustering in wireless sensor networks[C],In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mobile Ad Hoc Sensor Systems,2007: 1-4.

DOI: 10.1109/mobhoc.2007.4428638

Google Scholar

[6] J. Vesterstrom, R. Thomsen. A comparative study of differential evolution particle swarm optimization and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems[C],In: Proc. Congress on Evolutionary Computation,2004: 1980-(1987).

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2004.1331139

Google Scholar

[7] Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer. Proceedings of 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1998: 69-73.

DOI: 10.1109/icec.1998.699146

Google Scholar

[8] Van den Bergh F. An analysis of particle swarm optimizers. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] Shi Y, Eberhart R C. Empirical study of partile swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, (1999).

Google Scholar

[10] Zheng Y L, Ma L H, Zhang L Y, et al. Empirical study of particle swarm optimizer with an increasing inertia weight. Proceedings of 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2003: 221-226.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2003.1299578

Google Scholar

[11] Jiang C W, Etorre B. A self-adaptive chaotic particle swarm algorithm for short term hydroelectric system scheduling in deregulated environment. Energy Conversion and Management, 2005, 46(17): 2689-2696.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.01.002

Google Scholar

[12] Chatterjee A, Siarry P. Nonlinear inertia weight variation for dynamic adaptation in particle swarm optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 2006, 33(3): 859-871.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2004.08.012

Google Scholar

[13] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle Swarm Optimization[C]. Proceedings IEEE Int Conf on Neural Networks, 1995: 1942- (1948).

Google Scholar

[14] EBERHART R,KENNEDY J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory[C]. Proceedings 6th Int Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995: 39-43.

DOI: 10.1109/mhs.1995.494215

Google Scholar