Research on Efficient Spatial Keyword Queries Supporting Wildcard

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the popularity of location-based services, Web contents are being geo-tagged and spatial keyword queries that retrieve objects satisfying both spatial and keyword conditions are gaining in prevalence. The existing spatial keyword queries focus on exact match or prefix match of the keywords cannot satisfy the demand of wildcard based imprecise match in many realistic scenes. Aiming to solve this problem, two methods which are fit for different situation are put forward: the inverted file and R-tree integrated index which fits for the situation that requires high time efficiency and the Prefix Bloom Filter and R-tree integrated index which fits for the situation requiring high space efficiency. The effectiveness of the two indexes is valid through experiments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2554-2557

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sanderson, M. and J. Kohler. Analyzing Geographic Queries. SIGIR, (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] De Felipe, I., V. Hristidis, and N. Rishe. Keyword Search on Spatial Databases. ICDE, 2008: 656-665.

DOI: 10.1109/icde.2008.4497474

Google Scholar

[3] Cong, G., C.S. Jensen, and D. Wu. Efficient Retrieval of the Top-K Most Relevant Spatial Web Objects. VLDB, 2009: 337-348.

DOI: 10.14778/1687627.1687666

Google Scholar

[4] Yao, B., F. Li, M. Hadjieleftheriou, and K. Hou. Approximate String Search in Spatial Databases. ICDE, 2010: 545-556.

DOI: 10.1109/icde.2010.5447836

Google Scholar

[5] Roy, S.B., and K. Chakrabarti. Location-Aware Type Ahead Search on Spatial Databases: Semantics and Efficiency. SIGMOD, 2011: 361-372.

DOI: 10.1145/1989323.1989362

Google Scholar

[6] X. Cao, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, J. J. Ng, B. C. Ooi, N. Phan, D. Wu. SWORS: A System for the Efficient Retrieval of Relevant Spatial Web Objects. PVLDB, 2012: 1914-(1917).

DOI: 10.14778/2367502.2367536

Google Scholar

[7] Guttman, A. R-Trees: A Dynamic Index Structure for Spatial Searching. SIGMOD, 1984: 47-57.

DOI: 10.1145/971697.602266

Google Scholar

[8] Garfield, E. The Permuterm Subject Index: An Autobiographical Review. Journal of the ACM. 1976, 27: 288-291.

Google Scholar

[9] Bloom, Burton. Space/Time Trade-Offs in Hash Coding with Allowable Errors. Commun ACM. 1970, 13(7): 422-426.

DOI: 10.1145/362686.362692

Google Scholar

[10] Geographic Names Dataset. http: /geonames. usgs. gov, (2012).

Google Scholar