Study on Reinforce Saturated Soft Clay Foundation with Dynamic Consolidation by Drainage

Article Preview

Abstract:

Dynamic consolidation method has been widely used in improving soft land, but always inefficient to saturated soft clay land, which is hard to improve, and even leads to rubber soil. Dynamic and drain consolidation method will deal with it well, with drainage system, pore-water can be expelled instantly from saturated soft clay as impacting. The pore-water pressure and earth pressure test in construction, the standard penetration test, plate loading test, geotechnical test after construction, which are all effective methods for effect testing. There is a comprehensive detection through different depth of soil layer with different detecting means on construction site. The results show that improving saturated soft clay land with dynamic and drain consolidation method has obtained good effect, and the fruit can be guidance for such construction in the future.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1171-1175

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, Improve Land with Dynamic Consolidation and Dynamic Replacement Method, China Machine Press, BeiJing, (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Zheng, X. Lu, X. Li, et al, Research on theory and technology of improving soft clay with DCM, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 22 (2000) 18-22.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Wang, X. Li, Z. Li, et al, Indoor model test of dynamic drainage consolidation method of soft soil, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 30 (2009) 1163-1648.

Google Scholar

[4] JGJ79-2002, Occupation Standard Compile Group of The People's Republic of China, China Architecture &Building Press, Beijing, (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Zhou, S. Zhang, M. Jia, et al, Theoretic research situation and latest technical progress of dynamic consolidation method, Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2 (2006), 510-516.

Google Scholar