Performance Evaluation of Agritainment Service Supply Chain

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper puts forward the index system of evaluating performance of agritainment supply chain from three attribute domains, i.e. operation domain, hierarchy domain and composition domain, uses entropy technology and analytic hierarchy process to carry on the evaluation of service performance and probes into the application of agritainment supply chain theory in practice. It is quite important on enhancing the competitive power of the whole agritainment supply chain as well as the node enterprises in the agritainment supply chain. Finally, three problems that need further study in this field are pointed out.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1917-1923

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Richard Tapper, Xavier Font, Agritainment supply chain: Report of a Desk Research Project for The Travel Foundation. WWW. 1mu. ac. uk/life/the/Agritainment-Supply-Chains, April, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] J.A. Cooke, Measure for measure, Logistics, 7 (1999) 23.

Google Scholar

[3] J.A. Cooke, Knowing the score, Logistics, 2 (1999) 38-45.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Joseph Cronin, Jr. Steven A. Taylor, Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, 3 (1992) 70, 67, 92.

Google Scholar

[5] Marc Janna M. Augustan, Tim Knowles, Performance of agritainment partnerships: a focus on York, Agritainment Management, 21 (2000) 341-351.

Google Scholar

[6] Tom Selenium, Jamie Sweating, Supply chain management for tour operators, Tour Operators' Initiative for Sustainable Agritainment Development and the Center for Environmental Leadership in Business (CELB), Final version 24 (2003) 29-35.

Google Scholar

[7] Glenn B. Voss, A. Parasuraman Drewal, The roles of price, performance and expectation in determining satisfaction in service exchanges, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, 10 (1998) 46-61.

DOI: 10.1177/002224299806200404

Google Scholar