Polymer Ratio Optimization Based on Support Vector Machine and Genetic Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

For getting rid trial-and-error method of polymer blending modification depends on experience, nonlinear relation of polymer ratio and its properties is obtained by Support Vector Machine and Genetic Algorithm. While the application of genetic algorithms to optimize the SVM model. Decision function in the relational model of SVM as the objective function, and optimized the value of polymer properties and its ratio by genetic algorithms. Experiments show that the method has some values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1026-1032

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F ENG Wu-feng, WANG Chun-qing, ZHANG Lei. Calculation during material design, a new tendency in material design[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2000, 8(4): 57-62.

Google Scholar

[2] LI Qiang, YU Jing-yuan , SUN Xu-dong, LIU Zhi-gang. relationship between process parameters and porosity NiTi alloy using artificial neural network [J]. Materials Science and Technology 2007. 15(3): 316-318.

Google Scholar

[3] WANG Mei, WANG Zhuo, WANG Jie. Research on ANN-Based Machining Operation Selection for Rotational Parts [J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 2010, 39(3)470-474.

Google Scholar

[4] DOU Liu-ming, LIAO Ning-fang, WU Wen-min. The research of computer color matching of powder paints using BP neural networks [J]. Optical Technique 2008, 34(1)116-119.

Google Scholar

[5] Cao Yibo, Xie Xiaopeng . Wear Loss Prediction Using Least Square Support Vector Machine [J]. Lubrication Engineering [J]. 2007, 32(2): 138-141.

Google Scholar

[6] Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 24−46.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511801389

Google Scholar

[7] Wu C H, Tzeng G H, Lin R H. A Novel hybrid genetic algorithm for kernel function and parameter optimization in support vector regression[J]. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009. 36(3): 4725-4735.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.046

Google Scholar

[8] Fang S F, Wang M P, Qi W H, eta1. Hybrid genetic algorithms and support vector regression in forecasting atmospheric corrosion of metallic materials[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2008, 44(2): 647—655.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.05.010

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang Xue-gong. On statistical learning theory and support vector machine [J] . ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2000, 26( 1) : 32 -42.

Google Scholar

[10] WANG Shu-zhou, SAN Ye. A survey on training algorithms for support vector machine [ J] . CAAL Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2008, 3( 6) : 467 -475.

Google Scholar

[11] Boser B E, Guyon I M, Vapnik V N. A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers [ C] / / Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theo ry. Pittsburg h, PA, 1992: 144-152.

DOI: 10.1145/130385.130401

Google Scholar

[12] Zhou W D,Zhang L,Jiao L C. Adaptive support vector machine multi-user detection[J]. Electronic Journals,2002,31( 1) : 1-6.

Google Scholar

[13] Yu Q X,Wang K. Study on pattern and control of gasemission at coal face in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2000,1( 1) : 9-14.

Google Scholar

[14] Chang C C, Lin C J. Training v-support vector classifiers: theory and algorithms[J].Neural Computation, 2001, 13( 9) : 2119-2147.

DOI: 10.1162/089976601750399335

Google Scholar

[15] Chi W H,Chi J L. A simple decomposition method for support vector machines[J]. Machine Learning, 2002, 1( 46) : 291-314.

Google Scholar