Optimization Design for Coupling Beam Dampers of Shear Walls

Article Preview

Abstract:

The couple shear wall structures are well known for their anti-lateral stability, they have a promising future in macro complex high-level structures. Coupling beam dampers are the key components of coupled shear wall structures. In this manuscript, metallic in plane yield coupling beam damper with four types of poration and different pore areas are analyzed by Finite Element Method. It is found that the hourglass-shaped poring coupling beam damper has superior hysteretic behavior and higher carrying capacity comparing to other types of poring damper. In addition, the optimized poration parameters are further obtained by using Kriging surrogate model, which maximize the carrying capacity and enhance hysteretic behavior of the hourglass-shaped coupling beam damper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

115-121

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Paulay, T. Simulated Seismic Loading of Spandrel Beams[J]. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(ST9): 2047-2419.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0003003

Google Scholar

[2] Dai Ruitong, Sun Zhanguo. The diamond of the bearing capacity of the coupling beam of shear wall reinforcement [J]. Industrial construction, 1993, 10: 33-38.

Google Scholar

[3] Cao, dingjun, Cheng Wenrang. Shear wall structure control experimental study of coupling beam [J]. Journal of southeast university, 1991, 21 (4): 45-52.

Google Scholar

[4] Cao Zhengliang, HongXiang. Taking control of coupling beam double shear wall shaking table test research [J]. Journal of building structures, 2004, 25 (3) : 51-57.

Google Scholar

[5] Li Aiqun, Ding Da jun, Cao Zhengliang. Friction control device with double shear wall model shaking table test research [J]. Journal of engineering mechanics, 1995, 12 (3): 71-76.

Google Scholar

[6] B.S. Choo,A. Coull,Stiffening of Laterally Loaded Coupled shear Walls on Elastic Foundations [J]. Building and Environment, 1984, 4(19): 251-256.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(84)90006-4

Google Scholar

[7] Han Xiaolei. Both limbs of coupling beam with rigid shear wall and the structure control performance study: [D]. Guangzhou: south China university of technology, (1991).

Google Scholar

[8] LiuQingshan Liang Xingwen, Deng Mingke. Shear wall structure in strong method to determine the optimal location and number of coupling beam [J] Xi'an building university of science and technology journal (natural science edition), 2006, 38 (l) : 77-82.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang Gang. Experimental study on seismic behavior of coupling beam, steel plate concrete [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] Hee-San Chung, Byoung-Wook Moon, Sung-Kyung Lee, Ji-Hun Park, Kyung-Won Min, Seismic performance of friction dampers using flexure of RC shear wall system [J] TheStructural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2009, 807-822.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.524

Google Scholar

[11] Simpson T.W., Lin D.K., et al. Sampling Strategies for Computer Experiments: Design and Analysis [J]. International Journal of Reliability and Safety, 2001, 2(3): 209-240.

Google Scholar

[12] Lee K.H., Park G.J. A global robust optimization using the Kriging based Approximation model[J]. JSME International Journal,2006,49(3): 779-788.

Google Scholar

[13] Yuehua Gao, Xicheng Wang. Surrogate-based process optimization for reducing warpage in injection molding [J]. Journal of materials processing technology 209 ( 2009 ): 1302-1309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.048

Google Scholar