[1]
H. G. Zhao, G. , Crushing behavior of aluminum honeycombs under impact loading. Int.J. Impact Eng 2(10), 827–836., (1998).
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(98)00034-7
Google Scholar
[2]
M. K. Khan, Compressive and lamination strength of honeycomb sandwich panels with strain energy calculation from ASTM standards. DOI: 10. 1243/09544100JAERO76., (2006).
Google Scholar
[3]
V. JR, The Behavior of Sandwich Structures of Isotropic and Composite Materials, Technomic Publ, Lancaster PA., (1999).
Google Scholar
[4]
Y. L. a. H. Hu, "A review on auxetic structures and polymeric materials", Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 5 (10), SRE. ISSN 1992-2248 18 May, (2010).
Google Scholar
[5]
J. D. S. Jaehyung Ju, Complaint hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and and high shear strain. Journal of Materials and Design , (2010).
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.029
Google Scholar
[6]
J. J. Kwangwon Kim, Doo-Man Kim, and Hyun-Seung Yoo, MODULUS AND HIGH STRAIN FLEXURE DESIGN WITH AUXETIC HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES. IDETC/CIE 2012, DETC2012-70552., (2012).
Google Scholar
[7]
K. R. a. G. Olympio, F, Zero-ν Cellular Honeycomb Flexible Skins for One-Dimensional Wing Morphing, In Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA2007-1735, Honolulu, Hawaii., (2007).
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-1735
Google Scholar
[8]
S. P. a. J. N. G. Timoshenko, Theory of elasticity, 3rd ed., McGrawHill., (1970).
Google Scholar
[9]
A. Gibson LJ, Cellular solids, structure and properties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;, (1988).
Google Scholar
[10]
D. A. a. J. N. Grima, Modelling of hexagonal honeycombs exhibiting zero Poisson's ratio, Phys. Status Solidi B 248, No. 1, 52–59 (2011) / DOI 10. 1002/pssb. 201083980, 24 September (2010).
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201083980
Google Scholar
[11]
L. O. Joseph N. Grima, Daphne Attard, Brian Ellul, Ruben Gatt, Gianluca Cicala and Giuseppe Recca, Hexagonal Honeycombs with Zero Poisson's Ratios and Enhanced Stiffness, Phys. Status Solidi B 248, No. 1, 52–59 (2011).
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201000140
Google Scholar