The Kinetic Difference of Denitrification and Sulfate Reduction Conducted by Anaerobic Microbes

Article Preview

Abstract:

For investigating the competitive ability of denitrifying bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria on the substrate in the anaerobic environment, denitrification and sulfate reduction experiments were conducted under the conditions of different carbon content and different nitrate/sulfate ratio, and the kinetic difference of denitrification and sulfate reduction was also analyzed. The experimental results showed that denitrification could essentially be completed in 7~9 h at the same condition of carbon source content, but sulfate reduction was completed after 12 h. Denitrification rate constant of the microbes was over one time larger than that of sulfate reduction. When the carbon source was enough (C/N ratio and C/S ratio more than 3), denitrification efficiencies all surpassed 98%, while that of sulfate reduction only reached 84%. Under the same condition, the nitrate reduction ability of microbes was stronger than that of sulfate reduction, and the process of nitrate reduction had much more superiority.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

494-497

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Amnat Chidthaisong. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. Vol. 31 (2000), p.73.

Google Scholar

[2] Einarsen, A.M. ,Newman, R. C. Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 31 (2000), p.175.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Bentzen. Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 31 (1995), p.293.

Google Scholar

[4] Hyvik, Henrik. Biotechnol. Adv. Vol. 15 (1997), p.806.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Guang-min, Zhang Zhao-han, Chen Zhong-xi. China Water Supply and Drainage Vol. 5 (2007), p.39.

Google Scholar

[6] Wei Hua, Han Yun, Zhang Xiao-ming. Environ. Engin. Vol. 23( 2005)c76.

Google Scholar

[7] Ma Yong, Peng Yong-zhen. China Environ. Sci. 26(2006) , p.464.

Google Scholar

[8] Johannes C. M. Scholten, Peter M. van Bodegom, Jaap Vogelaar. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. Vol. 42(2002), p.375.

Google Scholar

[9] American Public Health Association. Standard testing methods for water and wastewater. 15th edition. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press (2002).

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Xu, Ren Nan-qi, Liu Guang-min. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology Vol. 38(2006), p.729.

Google Scholar

[11] State Environmental Protection Administration. Water and Wastewater Monitoring Analysis Method (fourth edition). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press (2002).

Google Scholar

[12] Achtnich, C, Alexandra Schuhmann, Thorsten Wind. Biol. Fertil. Soils Vol. 19(1995), p.65.

Google Scholar

[13] Ren Nan-qi, Wang Ai-jie, Zhen Wei-dong. Harbin Architectural University Vol. 34(2001), p.39.

Google Scholar

[14] R. Ghigliazza, A. Lodi. M. Rovatti. Resources Conservation & Recycling Vol. 29(2000), p.181.

Google Scholar