A Study on Permeabilities and Selectivities of Small-Molecule Gases for Composite Ionic Liquid and Polymer Membranes

Article Preview

Abstract:

In recent years, the utilisation of ionic liquids supported on porous polymer membranes has been demonstrated to enhance gas separation performance by improving both permeability and selectivity for several industrially-relevant gas mixtures. However, the use of such supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) is normally not feasible at elevated process temperatures due to the resulting decrease in ionic liquid viscosity, which can lead to increased loss of ionic liquid from the membrane support during operation. In addition, many of the polymer membranes typically used in SILMs exhibit relatively poor mechanical and thermal stabilities at high temperatures. To overcome these problems associated with SILMs, thermally-stable composite ionic liquid and polymer membranes (CILPMs) have been fabricated in this study, thus exploiting the beneficial properties of ionic liquids for gas separation at elevated temperatures. Poly (pyromellitimide-co-4,4-oxydianiline) (PMDA-ODA PI) in combination with the ionic liquid, [C4mi [NTf2] were used to fabricate the CILPMs. A measurement rig was designed and built to determine permeabilities and selectivities of the CILPMs for H2, N2, CO, CO2 and CH4 over a range of pressures and temperatures. The fabricated CILPMs were shown to maintain excellent mechanical and thermal stability over a wide range of processing conditions. Temperature was shown to greatly affect both permeability and selectivity of the membranes, whilst pressure had less influence. The incorporation of [C4mi [NTf2] into the membranes was found to significantly increase CO2 permeation and, therefore, it is anticipated that these CILPMs hold significant potential for CO2 separation applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

765-770

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[2] Y. Jiang, Z. Zhou, Z. Jiao, L. Li, Y. Wu, Z. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) 5058-5061.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Park, B. Kim, Y. Byun, S. Lee, E. Lee, J. Lee, Desalination 236 (2009) 342-348.

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Gan, Y. Zou, D. Rooney, P. Nancarrow, J. Thompson, L. Liang, M. Lewis, Adv. Colloid Interfac. 164 (2011) 45-55.

Google Scholar

[5] R.W. Baker, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41 (2002) 1393-1411.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Bernardo, E. Drioli, G. Golemme, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 (2009) 4638-4663.

DOI: 10.1021/ie8019032

Google Scholar

[7] E. Cho, J. Park, S.S. Sekhon, G. Park, T. Yang, W. Lee, C. Kim, S. Park, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 156 (2009) B197-B202.

Google Scholar

[8] D. R Pesiri, B. Jorgensen, R. C Dye, J. Membrane Sci. 218 (2003) 11-18.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Matsuura, Y. Hasuda, S. Nishi, N. Yamadat, Macromolecules 24 (1991) 5001–5005.

Google Scholar

[10] C.A. Scholes, G.W. Stevens, S.E. Kentish, Fuel 96 (2012) 15-28.

Google Scholar

[11] C.P. Fredlake, J.M. Crosthwaite, D.G. Hert, S.N.V.K. Aki, J.F. Brennecke, J. Chem. Eng. Data 49 (2004) 954-964.

DOI: 10.1021/je034261a

Google Scholar

[12] P. Bonhȏte, A. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram, M. Grätzel, Hydrophobic, Inorg. Chem. 35 (1996) 1168-1178.

DOI: 10.1021/ic951325x

Google Scholar