Hybridizing Adaptive Biogeography-Based Optimization with Differential Evolution for Global Numerical Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biogeography-based optimization (BBO) is a new biogeography inspired algorithm. It mainly uses the biogeography-based migration operator to share the information among solution. Differential evolution (DE) is a fast and robust evolutionary algorithm for global optimization. In this paper, we applied a hybridization of adaptive BBO with DE approach, namely ABBO/DE/GEN, for the global numerical optimization problems. ABBO/DE/GEN adaptively changes migration probability and mutation probability based on the relation between the cost of fitness function and average cost every generation, and the mutation operators of BBO were modified based on DE algorithm and the migration operators of BBO were modified based on number of iteration to improve performance. And hence it can generate the promising candidate solutions. To verify the performance of our proposed ABBO/DE/GEN, 9 benchmark functions with a wide range of dimensions and diverse complexities are employed. Experimental results indicate that our approach is effective and efficient. Compared with BBO/DE/GEN approaches, ABBO/DE/GEN performs better, or at least comparably, in terms of the quality of the final solutions and the convergence rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1283-1287

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Storn R, Price K, Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Global Opt 11(4): 341–359, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Boussaïd, I., Chatterjee, A., Siarry, P., & Ahmed-Nacer, M., Hybridizing Biogeography-Based Optimization With Differential Evolution for Optimal Power Allocation in Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, vol. 60, no. 5, p.2347–2353, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2011.2151215

Google Scholar

[3] Simon, D., Biogeography-based optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 12(6), p.702–713, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Simon, D., Mehmet, E., Dawei, D., Rick, R, Markov Models for Biogeography-Based Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—PART B: Cybernetics 41(1), p.299–306, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2010.2051149

Google Scholar

[5] Ma, H., & Simon, D., Blended biogeography-based optimization for constrained optimization, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(3), p.517–525, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.08.005

Google Scholar

[6] S Feng, Q Zhu, X Gong, S Zhong, An Improved Hybridizing Biogeography-Based Optimization with Differential Evolution for Global Numerical Optimization, 2nd International Conference on Science and Social Research (ICSSR 2013), pp.309-312, (2013).

DOI: 10.2991/icssr-13.2013.67

Google Scholar