Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Verification that Influence Factors of Climb and Conventional Milling on Surface Roughness

Article Preview

Abstract:

The surface roughness is an important indicator of precision. Generally, climb milling which is usually using in finish milling get better surface roughness and accuracy. In this paper, based on geometric analysis, the surface roughness of the conventional milling is better than the surface roughness of the climb. This result has been verified by experiment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

407-412

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ZHAO Xiao-ming. Simulation of workpiece Surface Texture in 5-axis Control Machining. Journal of SHANGHAI JIAOTONG University. Vol. 37 No. 5 May (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] TANG Gang. Modeling and Simulation Study on Multi-Axis Milled Surface Topography with Round Head Cutter. Journal of Kuming University of Science and Technology. Vol 32. No. 3 Jun (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] GUO Baozhen. Influence Facters Analysis of Climb milling and Conventional Milling on Surface Roughness in CNC Milling. Manufacturing Technology and Mchine Tool. 2011(02).

Google Scholar

[4] GAO Tengyun. The Digital Computation and Comparison of Contaet Length of Cutter Tooth and Stock Removal Thickness for Down Milling and Up Milling. Journal of Nanchang University Vol. 16. No. 3 Sept (1994).

Google Scholar

[5] LIU Mu. Study on Prediction of Surface Roughness in NC Machining ional Milling on Surface Roughness in CNC Milling. The Master thesis of Northwestern Polytechnical University March, (2006).

Google Scholar