A Background Subtraction Method for Defect Detection of Printed Image

Article Preview

Abstract:

Background subtraction is often used to detect the moving objects from static cameras. The difficult of defect detecting of printing matter is how to detect the unknown flaws in complicate background effectively. Inspired by the background modeling approach for moving objects detection, a background modeling method in defect detection of printed image is suggested in this paper. Those pixels without defects are regarded as background, while the flaw pixels are defined as foreground. Firstly, we select LBP histogram as texture feature and HSV histogram as color feature to model the background respectively. Then, lots of printed images in which there are no defects are used to update these two models. Finally, we utilize the models to detect defects of printing images. Experimental results show that this background model works well in our defect detection.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

421-427

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] You Fucheng, Zhang Lifan, and Zhang Yongbin: The Research of Printing's Image Defect Inspection Based on Machine Vision, in Proc. ICMA, 2009, pp.2404-2408.

DOI: 10.1109/icma.2009.5246130

Google Scholar

[2] Xie Xianghua,: A Review of Recent Advances in Surface Defect Detection using Texture analysis Technique, Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis, vol. 7, no. 3, pp.1-22, (2008).

DOI: 10.5565/rev/elcvia.268

Google Scholar

[3] Ajay Kumar: Computer-Vision-Based Fabric Defect Detection: A Survey, IEEE TRANSCATIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONIC, vol. 55, no. 1, pp.348-363, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/tie.1930.896476

Google Scholar

[4] Zhi Cijia: Automation Detection System of the Printed Matter Defects Based on the Machine Vision Technology, Guangdong University of Technology, May (2011).

Google Scholar

[5] R.J. Ong, J.T. Dawley and P.G. Clem: submitted to Journal of Materials Research (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Lorenzo Bruzzone, Diego Fernandez prieto: Automatic Analysis of the Difference Image for Unsupervised Change Detection, IEEE TRANSACTION ON GEOSCIENCE REMOTE SENSING, vol. 38, no. 3, pp.1171-1182, (2000).

DOI: 10.1109/36.843009

Google Scholar

[6] C. Wren, A. Azarbayejani, T. Darrell, and A. Pentland: Pfinder: Real-time tracking of the human body, In IEEE Trans. PAMI, (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/34.598236

Google Scholar

[7] C. Stauffer, W. E. L. Grimson: Adaptive Background Mixture Models for Real-Time Tracking, in IEEE proc. CVPR, vol. 2, pp.246-252, (1999).

Google Scholar

[8] Marko Heikkila, Matti Pietikainen: A Texture-Based Method for Modeling the Background and Detecting Moving Objects, In IEEE Trans, PAMI, vol. 28, no. 4, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2006.68

Google Scholar

[9] T. Bouwmans: Subspace Learning for Background Modeling: A Survey, Recent Patent On Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp.223-234, (2009).

DOI: 10.2174/2213275910902030223

Google Scholar

[10] Massimo Piccardi: Background subtraction techniques: a review, IEEE International Conference on Systems, pp.3099-3104, (2004).

Google Scholar

[11] A. Elgammal, D. Harwood, and L. Davis: Non-parametric model for background subtraction, in ECCV, (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] Sebastian Brutzer, Benjamin Hoferlin and Gunther Heidemann: Evaluation of Background Subtraction Techniques for Video Surveillance, in Proc. CVPR, 2011, p.1937-(1944).

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995508

Google Scholar

[13] Briechle, Kai, and Uwe D. Hanebeck. Template matching using fast normalized cross correlation. Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation, and Controls. International Society for Optics and Photonics, (2001).

Google Scholar