Investigation on the Turbulence Models Effect of a Coal Classifier by Using Computational Fluids Dynamics

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study evaluates five turbulence models to determine the best models to be implemented as it representing the turbulent flow inside the lab scale classifier. The models studied are: The standard ƙ-ɛ model, Renormalization-group (RNG) ƙ-ɛ model, Realizable ƙ-ɛ model, Standard k-ω model, and Reynolds stress model (RSM). Through analysis of air flow, the air velocity data can be obtained from computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the result shows that, standard ƙ-ɛ model and Realizable ƙ-ɛ model are found to be more appropriate to use than the other turbulence models. The model validation is conducted by comparing the simulated velocities with experimental data in a lab scale classifier from literature. ANSYS software is selected to be used to run the simulation and analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

617-621

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] World Coal Institute (WCI), The Coal Resource: A Comprehensive Overview Of Coal, World Coal Institution Publication, London (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Galk, W. Peukert, J. Krahnen, Industrial classification in a new impeller wheel classifier, Powder Technology, Vol. 105, (1999) 186-189.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(99)00136-9

Google Scholar

[3] J. Kolacz, Investigating Flow Conditions in Dynamic Air Classification, Mineral Engineering, 15 (2002) 131-138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0892-6875(01)00203-5

Google Scholar

[4] H.B. Vuthaluru, V.K. Pareek, R. Vuthaluru, Multiphase Flow Simulation of a Simplified Coal Pulveriser, Fuel Processing Technology , Volume 86 (2005) 1195-1205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.12.003

Google Scholar

[5] C. Bhasker, Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow in Complex Geometries Used in Power Plants, Advances in Engineering Software, 33 (2002) 71-83.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-9978(01)00053-9

Google Scholar

[6] A.C. Bemin, Simulation of the Two Phase Flow in a Lab Coal Pulverizer, Springer-Verlag (2005).

Google Scholar

[7] L. Karunakumari, C. Eswaraiah, S. Jayanti, S.S. Narayanan, Experimental And Numerical Study Of A Rotating Wheel Air Classifier, AIChE Journal, Volume 51, Issue 3 (2005) 776-790.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.10349

Google Scholar

[8] American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), AIChE Equipment Testing Procedure. Particle Size Classifiers, 2nd ed. AIChE, New York (1993) 1–64.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470938294

Google Scholar

[9] M.E. Samy, H.H. Mofreh, A Comparative study of turbulence models performance for turbulent flow in a planar asymmetric diffuse, World Acedemy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 53, (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] B.E. Launder, D.B. Spalding, The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol-3 (1974) 269-289.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2

Google Scholar

[11] D.C. Wilcox, Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW Industries, La Canada, California, (1998).

Google Scholar