The Anti-Influenza Activity of Cyclohexene Derivatives Studied by Topological Indices and Neural Network

Abstract:

In order to establish quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model of cyclohexene derivatives as neuraminidase inhibitors, the relationships between the anti-influenza activity of 34 cyclohexene derivatives and their molecular connectivity indices (^mX) as well as their electrotopological state indices (I_m) were analyzed, meanwhile molecular structures of the substances were also effectively characterized. On the one hand, two molecular connectivity ⁰X, ³X and four electrotopological state indices I₁, I₃, I₆, I₁₆, which were obtained by optimization of multiple linear stepwise regression, were employed to found QSAR model through stepwise regression analysis, where the correlation coefficient of equation was 0.906 and the average absolute error between experimental values and estimates was 0.37. On the other hand, Using these structural parameters above as the input neurons, a satisfying neural network model with the 6-2-1 network architecture was also constructed by the back-propagation (BP) algorithm, where the total correlation coefficient reached up to 0.966 and the average absolute error between experimental values and estimates of the model decreased to 0.19. Therefore it was concluded that the results of BP network were better than those of multiple linear regression methods.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 472)
• Pages: 764-769
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.472.764
• Online since: January 2014
• Authors: Wen Chang Zhuang, Xi Hua Du, Chang Jun Feng, Jing Li
• Keywords: Anti-Influenza Activity, Cyclohexene, Neuraminidase Inhibitor, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR)

References

[1] P.V. Rajeshwar, Hansch C: Bioorg. Med. Chem. Vol. 14 (2006), p.982.

[2] S.B. Yang, Y.G. Yang, Q.L. Yang, G.Z. Liang, Y. Pan, M. Shu, L.G. Li and Z.L. Li: Chin. J. Antibiotics Vol. 34 (2009), p.205.

[3] J.H. Kim, R. Resende and T. Wennekes: Science Vol. 340 (2013), p.71.

[4] H.Y. Shao, Z.R. Li: Chin. J. New Drugs Vol. 15 (2006), p.1440.

[5] V. Stell, K.D. Stewart and C.J. Mating: Biochemistry Vol. 42 (2003), p.718.

[6] X.H. Du: J. Chem. Ind. Eng. Vol. 61 (2010), p.3059.

[7] J. Verma, V.M. Khedkar and E.C. Coutinho: Curr. Top. Med. Chem. Vol 10 (2010), p.95.

[8] X.H. Du, Y. Chen and L.M. Dong: Food Science Vol. 31 (2010), p.300.

[9] Y.Z. Liang, L.C. Yi and Q.S. Xu: Sci. China B Vol. 38 (2008), p.278.

[10] M. Ali, M. Patel and D. Wilkinson: SAR QSAR Environ. Res. Vol 24 (2013), p.429.

[11] J.P. Doucet, A. Doucet-Panaye and J. Devillers: SAR QSAR Environ. Res. Vol 24 (2013), p.481.

DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2013.792499

[12] Q.N. Hu, Y.Z. Liang, Y.L. Wang, F.Q. Guo and L.F. Huang: Comput. Appl. Chem. Vol 20 (2003), p.386.

[13] M. Kompany-Zareh, N. Omidikia: J. Chem. Inf. Model. Vol 50 (2010), p. (2055).

[14] S.L. Yang, Y. Wu, H.X. Yu, L.S. Wang and C.H. Wang: J. Environ. Sci. Vol 32 (2012), p.1487.

[15] S.W. Yu, K.J. Zhu and F.Q. Diao: Appl. Math. Comput. Vol 195 (2008), p.66.

[16] G. Ioele, L.M. De and E. Dinc: Chem. Pharm. Bull. Vol 59 (2011), p.35.