Effects of Custom-Made and Thread Dental Implant Systems on the Stress Distribution in Alveolar Bone: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aiming to investigate the effects of custom-made and thread dental implant systems on the stress distribution in alveolar bone using linear analysis of the finite element method (FEM). Two types of systems: the custom-made implant and the thread dental implant system, were studied using a three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D FEA). Comparing the parts of all systems for loading in different directions, the stress and deformation distribution in custom-made implant and alveolar bone are better than that in thread dental implant system. The analysis data definitely demonstrated the difference in stress and deformation distribution of components in different dental implant systems. Results show the custom-made implants are provided with more advantages and can be used in future experiment and clinical test.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1487-1493

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jae-Hoon Lee, Val Frias, Keun-Woo Lee and Robert F. Wright: Prosthet Dent. Vol. 94 (2005), p.377.

Google Scholar

[2] Javed F, Romanos GE. J Dent. Vol. 38 (2010), p.612.

Google Scholar

[3] Brunski JB, Puleo DA, NanciA: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Vol. 15 (2000), p.15.

Google Scholar

[4] Hasa,Bourauel, Keilig: ComputerMethods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering . Vol. 14 (2011), p.1113.

Google Scholar

[5] Nakano YYYI: Dental Materials Vol. 28 (2012), p.1126.

Google Scholar

[6] Kagan Degerliyurt, BarisSimsek, ErkanErkmen: OralSurg Oral MedOral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod. Vol. 110 (2010), p.1.

Google Scholar

[7] Xianshuai Chen, L. H Xie, Jianyu Chen, R Du, F. Deng: J Mech Sci Technol. Vol. 26 (2012). No. 7, p. (1993).

Google Scholar

[8] Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. Vol. 9 (2006), p.257.

Google Scholar

[9] Ao J, Li T, Liu Y, Ding Y, Wu G, Hu K, Kong L: Comput Biol Med. Vol. 40 (2010), p.681.

Google Scholar

[10] Oğuz Eraslan, Özgür İnan: Clin Oral Invest. Vol. 14 (2010), p.411.

Google Scholar

[11] Yongki Yoon XS, Jen-Kuang Huang GH, Rechowicz K: Computer-Aided Design and Applications. Vol. 10 (2013), p.59.

Google Scholar

[12] Figliuzzi M, Mangano F, Mangano C: Int J Oral MaxillofacSurgVol. 41 (2012), p.858.

Google Scholar

[13] Joo-Ho Choi BL, Han JS: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Vol. 190(2001), p.6906.

Google Scholar

[14] Mangano FG, Cirotti B, Sammons RL, Mangano C: Lasers Med Sci. Vol. 27 (2012), p.1241.

DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1134-z

Google Scholar

[15] Pirker W, Kocher A: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Vol. 38 (2009), p.1127.

Google Scholar

[16] Pirker W, Kocher A: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. Vol. 31 (2011), p.663.

Google Scholar