A Method for the Assessment of the Inhalation Dose Exposure to Radionuclides in an Indoor Environment

Abstract:

The radionuclides released from NPPs (Nuclear Power Plants) as a result of accidents will significantly affect human health by causing cancer, genetic diseases, or acute radiation sickness. To investigate and evaluate the influence of the airborne hazardous materials on human bodies in an indoor environment in urban areas near NPPs, it is necessary to calculate the inhalation dose. In this study, a method for the assessment of the inhalation dose of indoor radionuclides was proposed. This method consists of the combination of the basic equation of natural ventilation and the empirical equation for calculation of the inhalation dose. The method was applied in a modeled densely urban domain, and CFD simulations were conducted to obtain the wind pressure distribution on the building surfaces. Moreover, the impacts of certain important parameters, including the ventilation coefficient, the age group of humans, the wind velocity, the urban street width, and the building height, were discussed in this paper. The results show that all of these parameters affect the indoor inhalation dose. In most cases, the indoor dose obtained at the same floor was higher with a higher ventilation coefficient, breathing rate, wind velocity, and street width or a lower building height. Furthermore, people living in the middle floors will generally be exposed to a lower inhalation dose than those in other floors especially the top floor.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 477-478)
• Pages: 412-422
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.477-478.412
• Online since: December 2013
• Authors: Xiao Feng Hu*, Hong Huang, Shi Fei Shen, Hong Yong Yuan
• Keywords: CFD, Densely Urban Area, Inhalation Dose, Nuclear Accidents, Wind Pressure

References

[1] M. Chino, H. Nakayama, H. Nagai, H. Terada, G. Katata, H. Yamazawa, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48 (2011) 1129-1134.

[2] J.E. Till, H.A. Grogan, Radiological risk assessment and environmental analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York, (2008).

[3] Y. Morino, T. Ohara, M. Nishizawa, Geophys. Res. Lett. (2011) 38.

[4] C. V. Srinivas, R. Venkatesan, R. Baskaran, V. Rajagopal, B. Venkatraman, Atmos. Environ. 61(2012) 66-84.

[5] A. Basit, F. Espinosa, R. Avila, S. Raza, N. Irfan, J. Radiol. Prot. 28 (2008) 539-561.

[6] J. Brandt, J. H. Christensen, L. M. Frohn, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2 (2002) 397-417.

[7] P. A. B. de Sampaio, M. A. G. Junior, C. M. F. Lapa. Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2008) 250-273.

[8] I. Korsakissok, A. Mathieu, D. Didier, Atmos. Environ, 70 (2013) 267-279.

[9] H. Terada, M. Chino, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 45 (2008) 920-931.

[10] M. Song, Y. Qiang, Fundamentals of nuclear environmental science (In Chinese). Atomic Energy Press, Beijing, (1999).

[11] Z. Pan, Radiation environmental impact assessment of the nuclear industry in China in the three decades, 1st ed. Atomic Energy Press ; Visuals Press, Beijing; Daly City, CA, (2009).

[12] IAEA, International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. International atomic energy agency, Vienna, (1996).

DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-815-1267-a

[13] P. Karava, T. Stathopoulos, A. K. Athienitis, Sol. Energy. 81 (2007) 20-30.

[14] P. Heiselberg, K. Svidt, P. V. Nielsen, Build. Environ. 36 (2001) 859-869.

[15] V. Yakhot, S. A. Orszag, S. Thangam, T. B. Gatski, C. G. Speziale, Phys. Fluids. a-Fluid 4 (1992) 1510-1520.

DOI: 10.1063/1.858424

[16] S. Murakami, A. Mochida, Y. Hayashi, Modification of production terms in k-ε model to remove overestimate of k value around windward corner, Tenth Wind Engineering Symposium, pp.199-204, (1988).

[17] H. Huang, R. Ooka, H. Chen, S. Kato, T. Takahashi, T. Watanabe, J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerod. 96 (2008)1774-1788.