AHP Based Technology Selection for Emerging Industry

Article Preview

Abstract:

Selecting the promising technologies to incorporate in new products is challenging for enterprises, especially for those who compete in emerging high-technology industries. By integrating external factor evaluation (EFE) and internal factor evaluation (IFE) matrix, this study proposes a new technology selection method. The proposed framework is applied to a real technology selection problem faced by a bio-technology enterprise in the context of Chinas economic, political and social environment. Two major aspects and 24 external/internal factors are determined. This study uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to sort the information and derives weights of each criterion. Empirical results indicate that the candidate technology is promising, and shall be developed as one of the enterprises primary products.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

438-442

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tessa van der Valk, Ellen H.M. Moors, Marius T.H. Meeus (2009). Conceptualizing Patterns in the Dynamics of Emerging Technologies: The Case of Biotechnology Developments in the Netherlands, Technovation, 29, 247-264.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.09.005

Google Scholar

[2] Shen, Y. -C., Chang, S. -H. , Lin, G.T.R., Yu, H. -C. (2010). A Hybrid Selection Model for Emerging Technology, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 151 –166.

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.05.001

Google Scholar

[3] Daw Ma, Chia-Chin Chang, Shiu-Wan Hung (2013). The Selection of Technology for Late-Starters: A Case Study of the Energy-Smart Photovoltaic Industry, Economic Modelling, 35, 10-20.

DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.030

Google Scholar

[4] Anna Nosella, Giorgio Petroni, Chiara Verbano (2005). Characteristics of the Italian Biotechnology Industry and New Business Models: The Initial Results of an Empirical Study, Technovation, 25, 841-855.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.002

Google Scholar

[5] Ernst & Young (2013). Biotechnology Industry Report, Ernst & Young, Report number: FN0016 1302-1027727 LA.

Google Scholar

[6] Ping Zhang, Ye Zhang (2013). Design of Development Roadmap for Biotech Industry in China, Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 1, 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract).

Google Scholar

[7] Malcolm Beynon (2002). DS/AHP Method: A mathematical Analysis, Including an Understanding of Uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 148-164.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00230-2

Google Scholar

[8] Anna Szczypinska, Edward W. Piotrowski (2009). Inconsistency of the Judgment Matrix in the AHP Method and the Decision Maker's Knowledge, Physica A, 388, 907-915.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.11.034

Google Scholar

[9] Huang, C.C., Chu, P.Y., Chiang, Y.H. (2008). A Fuzzy AHP Application in Government-Sponsored R&D Project Selection, Omega, 36, 1038-1052.

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.003

Google Scholar