A Three-Phase Inspection Policy Based on a Three-Stage Failure Process

Wen Bin Wang; Hui Ying Wang; Rui Peng

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.488-489.1272

Paper Titles

Pull-In Instability of Electrostatically Actuated Nano-Beams Using the Nonlocal-Gradient Elasticity Theory
p.1256

Assembly Process Planning Method for Complex Electromechanical Products
p.1260

Simulation Analyzing for Spinner Institutions of Iron Roughneck Based on ADAMS
p.1264

The Numerical Simulation of Small Melt-Blown Machine Spinning Die Bead by Fluent
p.1268

A Three-Phase Inspection Policy Based on a Three-Stage Failure Process
p.1272

Research on Maintenance Model of Main Equipment Based on UMM
p.1277

Research on the Very-High-Cycle Fatigue Life Analysis of High-Speed Take-Up Winder
p.1281

Study on Total Measuring Effect of Ionizing Irradiation of Schottky Diode
p.1285

A Car-Following Model Considering Effects of Weather and Road Conditions
p.1289

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 488-489A Three-Phase Inspection Policy Based on a...

A Three-Phase Inspection Policy Based on a Three-Stage Failure Process

Abstract:

This paper proposes a three-phase inspection policy model based on a three-stage failure process for a single unit system. Different from existing works which usually assume unique inspection interval, the three-phase inspection policy allows the inspection policy to change according to the identified state of the unit. The possible renewal scenarios are considered based on which the cost model is proposed. Numerical example is presented, and the results clearly reveal the advantage of the three-phase inspection policy over the unique interval inspection.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials Science, Civil Engineering and Architecture Science, Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Technology

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

1272-1276

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.488-489.1272

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2014

Authors:

Wen Bin Wang*, Hui Ying Wang, Rui Peng

Keywords:

Delay Time, Inspection, Replacement, Three-Stage Failure Process

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] R. P. Nicola and R. Dekker. Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: a review. in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, edtied by D. N. P Murthy and A. K. S. Kobbacy. Amsterdam, Springer (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-011-7_11

Google Scholar

[2] W. Wang. A model of multiple nested inspections at different intervals. Computer and Operations Research, 6(27), pp.539-558(2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00046-5

Google Scholar

[3] A. Nath Das and D. Acharya. Age replacement of components during IFR delay time. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 3(53), pp.306-312(2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tr.2004.833422

Google Scholar

[4] A.H. Christer. Innovative decision making. in: Proceedings of the NATO Conference On The Role And Effectiveness Of Theories Of Decision In Practice, edtied by KC Bowen, DJ White. Hodder and Stoughton, 35, 368-377(1976).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Wang. Delay time modelling, in: Complex system maintenance handbook. Edtied by D.N.P. Murthy, A.K.S. Kobbacy. Amsterdam, Springer, pp.345-730(2008).

Google Scholar

[6] W. Wang. A inspection model based on a three-stage failure process. in: Reliability Engineering＆System Safety, 94(7), 838-848(2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.003

Google Scholar

[7] M.D. Berrade. A two-phase inspection policy with imperfect testing. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 36, 108-114(2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.05.035

Google Scholar

[8] C.A.V. Cavalcante, P.A. Scarf, A.T. Almeida, C.E. Silva-Neto. A two-phase inspection policy for a single component preparedness system with a mixed time to failure distribution. in: Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Applications, edited by R. Bris, C.G. Soares, S. Martorell (London: Taylor and Francis 2009), pp.525-530.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203859759.ch72

Google Scholar