Dynamic Modeling and Control of Flexible Hexapod Platform for Micro-Vibration Isolation and Precision Tracking

Article Preview

Abstract:

Micro vibrations, produced by reaction flywheels, coolers, driving motors and other moving parts in spacecrafts, will result in jitters and performance degradation of sensitive optical payloads, such as laser communication platforms, space telescopes and staring cameras. In this paper, one hexapod platform with flexible ball joints is employed to suppress vibrations and steer the payload in 6-degree-of-freedom (DOF). At first, dynamic modeling of the flexible hexapod platform with two-stage hybrid isolation struts is derived. Then, a composite control strategy is proposed for vibration isolation and precision tracking. Finally, the simulation study is presented to validate the proposed control strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

412-420

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. J. Bronowicki. Vibration Isolator for Large Space Telescopes. Journal of spacecraft and rocket, 2006, 43(1): 45-53.

DOI: 10.2514/1.12036

Google Scholar

[2] V. Sannibale, G. G. Ortiz and W. H. Farr. A Sub-hertz Vibration Isolation Platform for a DeepSpace Optical Communication Transceiver Preceding of SPIE conference on Free-Space LaserCommunication Technologies XXI. Bellingham, 2009, 7199, No. 71990I.

DOI: 10.1117/12.810949

Google Scholar

[3] R. A. Laskin. Successful Completion of Sim-planetquest Technology, Preceding of SPIE conference on Advances in Stellar Interferometry. 2006, 6268: 10-23.

DOI: 10.1117/12.670849

Google Scholar

[4] R. A. Masterson, D. W. Miller and R. L. Grogan. Development and Validation of Reaction Wheel Disturbance Models: Empirical Mode. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 249(3): 575-598.

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3868

Google Scholar

[5] D. Wolfe, C. Kirkconnell and G. Fleischman. Jitter Suppression Techniques for MechanicalCryocooler-induced Disturbances, Proceedingsof SPIE conference. 2008, 7087: 1-10.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Vahdati, M. Ahmadian. Hybrid Secondary Suspension Systems. Shock and vibration, 2009, 16(5): 467-480.

DOI: 10.1155/2009/624170

Google Scholar

[7] M. E. Hoque, T. Mizuno, D. Kishita, et al. Development of an Active Vibration Isolation SystemUsing Linearized Zero-power Control with Weight Support Springs. ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 2010, 132(4): 1-9.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4000968

Google Scholar

[8] J. Spanos. A Soft 6-axis Active Vibration Isolator, proceeding of American Control Conference. 1995: 412-416.

Google Scholar

[9] E. H. Anderson, J. P. Fumo and R. S. Erwin. Satellite Ultraquiet Isolation Technology Experiment, IEEE Aerospace Conference. 2000, 4: 299-313.

DOI: 10.1109/aero.2000.878441

Google Scholar

[10] R. G Cobb, J. M. Sullivan and A. Das. Vibration Isolation and Suppression System for Precision. Payloads in Space. Smart Materials and Structures, 1999, 43: 798-812.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/8/6/309

Google Scholar

[11] M. McMickell, T. Kreider, E. Hansen. Optical Payload Isolation Using the Miniature VibrationIsolation System (MVIS-II), SPIE Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart StructuresTechnologies. 2007, 6527: 652703.

DOI: 10.1117/12.715446

Google Scholar

[12] M. Privat. On Ground and in Orbit Microvibrations Measurement ComparisonProceedings ofthe 8th European Symposium Space Mechanisms and Tribology. Toulouse, 1999: 181-186.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Sidi, M. Rycroft and R. Stengel. Spacecraft Dynamics and Control: A Practical Approach[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, (1997).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Skogestad, I. Postlethwaite. Multivariable Feedback Control: Design and Analysis. 2ndEdition, Chichester: John Wiley Sons Ltd, (2005).

Google Scholar

[15] K. Zhou, J. Doyle. Essentials of Robust Control[M]. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, (1998).

Google Scholar