Imprecise Risk Assessment of Power System

Abstract:

The incomplete probabilistic information can lead to imprecision. The traditional power system risk assessment can only deal with random information, but it cannot deal with the imprecise information. Interval Probability (IP) can reflect both randomness and imprecision. The risk assessment of power system based on IP is an effective method to deal with imprecision and can provide more useful information to the decision-makers. In the paper, the completeness degree of probabilistic information was depicted by IP. The nonlinear optimization models for imprecise risk assessment of generating system and composite generation-transmission system were established. And the genetic algorithm was used to obtain the upper and lower bound of reliability indices. Case study on revised IEEE-RTS79 and IEEE-RBTS system showed the rationality and equity of presented method.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 492)
• Pages: 526-530
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.492.526
• Online since: January 2014
• Authors: Xian Jun Qi, Xiang Tian Peng, Xiang Yu Huang
• Keywords: Imprecise Risk Assessment, Interval Probability, Power System, Reliability

References

[1] Utkin LV, Coolen FPA. Imprecise reliability: an intro-ductory overview[M]. Computational Intelligence in Relia-bility Engineering, Volume2: New Metaheuristics, Neuraland Fuzzy Techniques in Reliability, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Chapter10, 2007: 261-306.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-37372-8_10

[2] Lovric M. International encyclopedia of statistical science[M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 645-648.

[3] Yuan Zhao, Kaigui Xie. Uncertainty of reliability parameters in probabilistic risk assessment of bulk power systems[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(4): 6-11, 60. (In Chinese).

[4] Xiaolin Li, Kan Cao, Kaigui Xie, et al. Sensitivity analysis of Hvdc transmission system reliability using the least square method[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(18): 12-16. (In Chinese).

[5] Zhen Ren, Zhensheng Liang, Wenying Huang. Sensitivity analysis of ac/dc hybrid transmission system reliability in-dices[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2004, 28(14): 33-40. (In Chinese).

[6] Li WY, Zhou JQ, Lu JP, et al. Incorporating a combined fuzzy and probabilistic load model in power system relia-bility assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2007, 22(3): 1386-1388.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2007.901676

[7] Li WY, Zhou JQ, Xie KG, et al. Power system risk as-sessment using a hybrid method of fuzzy set and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(2): 336-343.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2008.919201

[8] Haroonabadi H, Haghifam MR. Generation reliability assessment in power market using fuzzy logic and Monte Carlo simulation. International Conference on Intelligent Systems Applications to Power Systems[C]. Toki Messe, Niigata, 2007: 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/isap.2007.4441637

[9] Peng Zhang, Shouxiang Wang. A novel interval method for reliability evaluation of large scale distribution system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2004, 24(3): 77-84. (In Chinese).

[10] Feng YQ, Wu WC, Zhang BM, et al. Power system operation risk assessment using credibility theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(3): 1309- 1318.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2008.922616