[1]
Burnett E.F.P. Abnormal Loadings and Safety of Buildings.Report for the Structures Section, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 1973.
Google Scholar
[2]
Burnett E.F.P. The Avoidance of Progressive Collapse:Regulatory Approaches to the Problem [J], National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 1975.
Google Scholar
[3]
Baker J W, Schubert M, Faber M H. 2008. On the assessment of robustness [J]. Structural Safety, 30(3): 253-267.
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.004
Google Scholar
[4]
Ellingwood B R. 2005. Strategies for mitigating risk of progressive collapse [J]. New York: Proceeding of ASCE/SEI Structures Conference.
Google Scholar
[5]
Lu Da gang, SONG Peng yan. Structural robustness and its assessment indicators [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011, 32: 44-54. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[6]
LU Da gang, CUI Shuang shuang, LI Yanjun, WANG Guang yuan. Robustness analysis for progressive collapse of structures using an alternate load path based pushover analysis approach [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010, 31 (Suppl. 2 ) : 112-118. ( in Chinese ).
Google Scholar
[7]
Ma Ren le , Chen Jun ling , He min juan. Analytical method of alternative defensive ability for building structures [J]. Journal of tong ji university (natural science) , 2006, 34: 569-573. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[8]
Kouichirou Keira. Guidelines for collapse control design construction of steel buildings with high redundancy [M]. 2007. 8.
Google Scholar
[9]
Department of Defense, Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse UFC4-023-03, [s], (2013).
Google Scholar
[10]
Department of Defense,Interim Antiterrorism/Force Protection Construction Standards [s], Washington, D.C., March2001.
Google Scholar
[11]
Dusenberry D O, Hamburger R O. 2006. Practical means for energy-based analyses of disproportionate collapse potential[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(4): 336-348.
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2006)20:4(336)
Google Scholar
[12]
GSA. 2003, Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, D. C: United General Services Administration.
Google Scholar