Factors Influencing Hoop Rupture Strains of FRP-Confined Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is now well understood that the hoop rupture strain of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets confining concrete is often lower than the ultimate tensile strain of the component fibers. A number of reasons for the lower hoop rupture strains in FRP have been identified; however, the relationships between the material properties of FRP-confined concrete and hoop ruptures strains are yet to be established. This paper presents the results of an experimental study into the factors influencing the hoop strain efficiency of FRP jackets. 24 FRP-confined concrete specimens were tested under axial compression. The results indicate that the hoop rupture strains of FRP jackets decrease with either an increase in the strength of the unconfined concrete or the elastic modulus of the fiber material. These observations were verified by additional results from a large FRP-confined concrete test database assembled from the published literature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

949-953

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Ozbakkaloglu, J.C. Lim, and T. Vincent: FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress–strain models, Engineering Structures, Vol. 49 (2013), p.1068–1088.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.010

Google Scholar

[2] T. Ozbakkaloglu and M. Saatcioglu: Seismic behavior of high-strength concrete columns confined by fiber-reinforced polymer tubes, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 10 (2006), pp.538-549.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2006)10:6(538)

Google Scholar

[3] T. Ozbakkaloglu and M. Saatcioglu: Seismic performance of square high-strength concrete columns in FRP stay-in-place formwork, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 133 (2007), pp.44-56.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2007)133:1(44)

Google Scholar

[4] M. Saatcioglu, T. Ozbakkaloglu, and G. Elnabelsy: Seismic Behavior and Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns Confined with FRP Stay-in-place Formwork, ACI Special Publication SP-257, (2008), pp.149-170.

DOI: 10.14359/20245

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Idris and T. Ozbakkaloglu: Seismic behavior of high-strength concrete-filled FRP tube columns, Journal of Composites for Construction, (2013) doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)CC. 1943-5614. 0000388.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000388

Google Scholar

[6] K.A. Harries and G. Kharel: Behavior and modeling of concrete subject to variable confining pressure, Aci Materials Journal, Vol. 99 (2002), pp.180-189.

DOI: 10.14359/11711

Google Scholar

[7] L. Lam and J.G. Teng: Ultimate condition of fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 8 (2004), pp.539-548.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539)

Google Scholar

[8] J.C. Lim and T. Ozbakkaloglu: Confinement model for FRP-confined high-strength concrete, Journal of Composites for Construction, (2013) doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)CC. 1943-5614. 0000376.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000376

Google Scholar

[9] S. Pessiki, K.A. Harries, J.T. Kestner, R. Sause, and J.M. Ricles: Axial behavior of reinforced concrete columns confined with FRP jackets, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 5 (2001), pp.237-245.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2001)5:4(237)

Google Scholar

[10] Y. -F. Wu and J. -F. Jiang: Effective strain of FRP for confined circular concrete columns, Composite Structures, Vol. 95 (2013), p.479–491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.021

Google Scholar

[11] J.F. Chen, J. Ai, and T.J. Stratford: Effect of Geometric Discontinuities on Strains in FRP-Wrapped Columns, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 14 (2010), pp.136-145.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000053

Google Scholar

[12] T. Ozbakkaloglu: Concrete-filled FRP Tubes: Manufacture and testing of new forms designed for improved performance, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 17 (2013), pp.280-291.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000334

Google Scholar

[13] T. Ozbakkaloglu and D.J. Oehlers: Concrete-filled square and rectangular FRP tubes under axial compression, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 12 (2008), pp.469-477.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2008)12:4(469)

Google Scholar

[14] T. Ozbakkaloglu and D.J. Oehlers: Manufacture and testing of a novel FRP tube confinement system., Engineering Structures, Vol. 30 (2008), pp.2448-2459.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.014

Google Scholar

[15] S.T. Smith, S.J. Kim, and H. Zhang: Behavior and Effectiveness of FRP Wrap in the Confinement of Large Concrete Cylinders, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 14 (2010), pp.573-582.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000119

Google Scholar

[16] T. Ozbakkaloglu: Compressive behavior of concrete-filled FRP tube columns: Assessment of critical column parameters., Engineering Structures, Vol. 51 (2013), pp.188-199.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.017

Google Scholar

[17] T. Ozbakkaloglu and E. Akin: Behavior of FRP-confined normal- and high-strength concrete under cyclic axial compression., Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 16 (2012) pp.451-463.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000273

Google Scholar

[18] T. Ozbakkaloglu and T. Vincent: Axial compressive behavior of circular high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes, Journal of Composites for Construction, (2013) doi: 10. 1061/ (ASCE)CC. 1943-5614. 0000410.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000410

Google Scholar

[19] T. Vincent and T. Ozbakkaloglu: Influence of concrete strength and confinement method on axial compressive behavior of FRP confined high- and ultra high-strength concrete, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 50 (2013), p.413–428.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.017

Google Scholar

[20] T. Vincent and T. Ozbakkaloglu: Influence of fiber orientation and specimen end condition on axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47 (2013), pp.814-826.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.085

Google Scholar

[21] ASTM-D3039, Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials, West Conshohocken, PA. (2008).

Google Scholar

[22] T. Ozbakkaloglu and J.C. Lim: Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete: Experimental test database and a new design-oriented model, Composites Part B: Engineering, (2013) doi: 10. 1016/j. compositesb. 2013. 07. 025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.025

Google Scholar

[23] T. Ozbakkaloglu: Axial compressive behavior of square and rectangular high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 17 (2013), pp.151-161.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000321

Google Scholar

[24] T. Ozbakkaloglu: Behavior of square and rectangular ultra high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes under axial compression, Composites Part B: Engineering., Vol. 54 (2013), pp.97-111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.007

Google Scholar

[25] J.G. Dai, Bai, Y. L., and Teng, J. G. : Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability., ASCE J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 15, (2011), p.963–973.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000230

Google Scholar