Research on Compensation Correction of Leak Impact Factor of Kent Index Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aiming at the existing defects of pipeline risk assessment model of Kent index method on spill score,population score and leak impact factor, five compensation coefficient are put forward in pipeline risk assessment basic model qualitatively,of which include past failure modes,emergency response, sensitive environment,high value areas and support/oppose of nearby residents.Thus,the compensation correction model on leak impact factor of pipeline risk assessment are established.This model enhances the accuracy for the work of pipeline risk assessment.Finally,the verification analysis showed that the modified model can objectively reflect the degree of pipeline risk.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

105-110

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. kent Muhlbauer. Pipeline Risk Management Manual(Second Edition)[M]. Gulf Publishing Company, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] D. HU,S. LUO,Q. JIANG. Pipeline safety index assessment on sensitivity analysis[J]. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry. Forum Vol. 26-2 (2010), p.5.

Google Scholar

[3] M. LING,Y. LI,A. YAO. Environment and geological disaster risk assessment model of gas pipeline[J]. Oil-Gasfield Surface Engineering, Forum Vol. 30-1 (2011), p.27.

Google Scholar

[4] H. PU,A. YAO,X. ZHAO. On the improvement and application of oil and gas pipeline risk grading system[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition), Forum Vol. 13-6 (2011), p.85.

Google Scholar

[5] Michael J. Zelensky et al. Public safety risk assessment of natural gas liquid pipelines[J]. International Pipeline Conference,ASME,2006(1).

Google Scholar

[6] O. ZHAO,P. ZHANG. Comparative Analysis of the Index System for an Assessment of Long-distance Natural Gas and City Gas Pipeline Risk[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, Forum Vol. 1 (2012), p.12.

Google Scholar

[7] Q. WANG,S. HE,W. DANG. Study on performance evaluation of safety pre-warning technology on oil and gas pipeline[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, Forum Vol 9-1 (2013), p.98.

Google Scholar

[8] K. WANG,N. WANG,C. ZHANG. Risk characteristics of urban natural gas pipeline and improvement of the Kent Method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, Forum Vol 18-9 (2008), p.33.

Google Scholar