Reasoning Method of Remote Sensing Imagery Based on Topological Transformation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Remote sensing image analysis is an important aspect of remote sensing technology and application, but until now a comprehensive mathematical model is still missing for spatial analysis and reasoning. From the mathematical essence, the processing of remote sensing image analysis is to build a transform relationship between the premise and the conclusion of reasoning based on domain knowledge, and which is used to deal with the transformation reasoning. Based on fuzzy set and topology theory, this paper discussed how to build mathematical models of target identification, information extraction, and semantic extraction of remote sensing imagery. By a series of reasoning, a reasoning model based on the topological transformation is proposed, which is used to transform remote sensing image analysis into an uncertainty reasoning of mathematical sciences.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

421-424

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G.B. Zhu. Remote Sensing Image Analysis Based on Hierarchical Multi-resolution Structures. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, Vol. 28(2003), pp.315-320.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Molenaar, T. Cheng, Fuzzy spatial objects and their dynamics. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 55(2000), pp.164-175.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-2716(00)00017-4

Google Scholar

[3] G. M. Foody, P. M. Atkinson, Uncertainty in remote sensing and GIS (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Xu, P. Watanachaturapom, P. K. Varshney, et al., Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data. remote sensing of environment, Vol. (97)(2005), pp.322-336.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.008

Google Scholar

[5] U. C. Benz, P. Hofmann, G. Willhauck, et al., Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58 (2004), pp.239-258.

DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002

Google Scholar

[6] A. Browne and R. Sun, Connectionist inference models. neural networks, Vol. 14(2001), pp.1331-1355.

DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(01)00109-5

Google Scholar

[7] P. Quinio, T. Matsuyama, Random Closed Sets: A unified approach to the representation of imprecision and uncertainty. in: symbolic and quantitative approaches to uncertainty, edited by G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg (1991).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-54659-6_102

Google Scholar

[8] V.N. Ara, L.H. Liang, X.B. Pi, et al., Dynamic bayesian networks for audio-visual speech recognition. EURASIP Journal On Applied Signal Processing, Vol. 1(2002), pp.1274-1288.

DOI: 10.1155/s1110865702206083

Google Scholar

[9] D. F. Sinton, The inherent structure of information as a constraint to analysis: mapped thematic data as a case study. Ma: Harvard University Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis, Cambridge (1978).

Google Scholar

[10] N. R. Chrisman, The error component in spatial data. In: Geographical Information Systems: Overview Principles and Application, edited by D. J. Maguire, M. F. Goodchild, and D. W. Rhind, Longmans, New York, (1991).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Gahegan, M. Ehlers, A framework for the modelling of uncertainty between remote sensing and geographic information systems. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Vol. 55(2000), pp.176-188.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-2716(00)00018-6

Google Scholar

[12] W.X. Zhang, Y. Liang, P. Xu, Uncertainty reasoning based on the contained degree (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2007).

Google Scholar

[13] K. Qin, Z. Pei, On the topological properties of fuzzy rough sets. Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol. 51 (2005), pp.601-613.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.017

Google Scholar

[14] S. Arivazhagan, L. Ganesan, Texture classification using wavelet transform. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 24 (2003), pp.1513-1521.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(02)00390-2

Google Scholar