A Family Particle Swarm Optimization Based on the Animal Collective Behavior

Article Preview

Abstract:

To study the organizational structure of particles in particle swarm optimization (PSO), we have proposed the family PSO (FPSO) previously. To further study the internal structure of FPSO, this paper introduced the animal collective behavior into the FPSO. It made the interaction ruling among particles was not based on random selection but topological distance. Each family interacted on average with a fixed number of neighbors, rather than with all neighbors within a fixed metric distance. Simulations for four benchmark functions demonstrated that the interaction ruling based on topological distance among particles was more reasonable than that on random selection.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2439-2443

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization [C], IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, 1995, 1942-(1948).

Google Scholar

[2] D. Bratton and J. Kennedy, Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization [C], 2007 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposuim, Piscataway, NJ, 2007, 120-127.

DOI: 10.1109/sis.2007.368035

Google Scholar

[3] F. Van Den Berghand and A. P. Engelbrecht, A study of particle swarm optimization particle trajectories [J], Information Sciences, 2006, 176 937–971.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2005.02.003

Google Scholar

[4] M. A. Montes de Oca, T. Stützle, K. Van den Enden, and M. Dorigo, Incremental Social Learning in Particle Swarms, Technical report number TR/IRIDIA/2009-002, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxells, Belgium, (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] C. K. Monson and K. D. Seppi, Adaptive diversity in PSO [C], the Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO '06), New York, USA, 2006, 59–66.

DOI: 10.1145/1143997.1144006

Google Scholar

[6] M. A. Montes de Oca, J. Pe˜na, T. Stützle, C. Pinciroli, and M. Dorigo, Heterogeneous Particle Swarm Optimizers, Technical report number TR/IRIDIA/2009-001. 001, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxells, Belgium, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2009.4983013

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Z. An, X. L. Shi, and J. H. Zhang, Family particle swarm optimization [C], 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications  Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM 2010), IEEE Press, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/wicom.2010.5601359

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Z. An, X. L. Shi, and J. H. Zhang, The Direction of Family Particle Swarm Optimization [C], IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS 2010), 2010, 3 49-53.

DOI: 10.1109/icicisys.2010.5658555

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Z. An, X. L. Shi, and J. H. Zhang, A Study on the Internal Structure of Family Particle Swarm Optimization [C], the Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (ICGEC-2010), 2010, 27-30.

DOI: 10.1109/icgec.2010.15

Google Scholar

[10] M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte and A. Orlandi, Interaction ruling animal collective behavior denpends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study [J], PNAS, 2008, 105(4) 1232-1237.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711437105

Google Scholar

[11] M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, The particle swarm: Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space [J], IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(1) 58–73.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.985692

Google Scholar