Suppression of Sunlight Interference for Fluorescence In Situ Measurement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Except for system noise, the sunlight interference can severely influence the result of fluorescence in situ measurement. In this paper, we analyzed the noise sources of the fluorescence in situ measurement system, discussed the characteristics of sunlight interference, and studied the performances of three sunlight interference suppression methods that respectively based on pulse width modulation, lock-in amplifier and pseudorandom sequence modulation. Experiment results show that methods based on lock-in amplifier and pseudorandom sequence modulation can effectively suppress sunlight interference.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3688-3690

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chekalyuk, A. and M. Hafez. Photo-physiological variability in phytoplankton chlorophyll fluorescence and assessment of chlorophyll concentration. Optics Express 2011, 19(23): 22643-22658.

DOI: 10.1364/oe.19.022643

Google Scholar

[2] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B , Matson P A, Vitousek PM, Mooney H A , Klooster S A. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 1993, 7: 811-841.

DOI: 10.1029/93gb02725

Google Scholar

[3] Gaofang Yin, Yujun Zhang, Zhigang Wang. Algae online monitor based on fluorescence method[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2010, 23: 40-45.

Google Scholar

[4] Gabal, M., N. Medrano, et al. . A complete low voltage analog lock-in amplifier to recover sensor signals buried in noise for embedded applications. Eurosensors Xxiv Conference, 2010, 5: 74-77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.09.051

Google Scholar

[5] Nan Guang Chen, Quing Zhu. Time-resolved diffusive optical imaging using pseudo-random bit sequences. Optics Express, 2003, 11(25): 3445-3454.

DOI: 10.1364/oe.11.003445

Google Scholar