A Research into the UML Legend in the Waterfall Model Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

The ambiguity and dynamics of the users demand in the requirement phase of the classic waterfall model, as well as the information errors caused by the professional psychological differences between the end-users and software developers threaten the software development process and the quality of the final outcome. This paper makes a deep analysis on the dependence of manual examination and verification among users and developers, and formulates a reasonable solution to improve the accuracy, completeness in the requirements phase by leading in the UML pattern.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

322-328

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Gregor, D.A. Sykes, Object-oriented Software Development: Engineering Software for Reuse, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York, (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] B. A. Sadovykh Andrey, B. E. Vos, E.J. Tanja, The OMG UML Testing Profile in Use-An Industrial Case Study for the Future Internet Testing, in Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/csmr.2013.71

Google Scholar

[3] N. Zhang, W. Wang, H. Xia, College Office Management System Modeling and Design Based on UML B/S Architecture, PC Development. 13(12)(2003) 17-19.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Zhang, H. Xia, College Administration Management Information Based on UML, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. 32(12)(2009) 139-142.

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Yuan , H. Xia, Research on Online Software System Development Scheme Based on SaaS Pattern , Computer Engineering and Design. 30(11)(2009) 2714-2717.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Zhong, B. Li, H. Xia, J. Xu, Intelligent Cell Property Management System Design Based on MapX, Computer Application Research. 3(2006) 111-112, 115.

Google Scholar