Spatial Topological Relationship for Remote Sensing Image Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

For remote sensing imagery, spatial relationships are extracted by segmentation and classification. Unlike traditional vector relationships, spatial relationship reasoning is equivalent to constraint satisfaction problems in the image process. Based on 9-intersect model, the paper discuss spatial topological relationship between image objects to provide a theoretical and technical support for low levels of image segmentation, high-level analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

585-589

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z.G. Jia, X.L. Liu, Modeling Spatial Relationships for Remote Sensing Image Processing Based on Fuzzy Set Theory. In: International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Vol. 4(2008), pp.1101-1104.

DOI: 10.1109/csse.2008.1446

Google Scholar

[2] M.J. Egenhofer, J. Sharma, Topological Relations between Regions in R2 and Z2. In: the Third International Symposium on Large Spatial Databases, 1993, pp.316-336.

Google Scholar

[3] D.M. Mark, M.J. Egenhofer, Modeling Spatial Relations between Lines and Regions Combining Formal Mathematical Models and Human Subjects Testing [J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 1994, Vol. 21, pp.195-212.

Google Scholar

[4] J.M. Keller, X. Wang, Learning Spatial Relationships in Computer Vision. In: the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 1996, pp.118-124.

Google Scholar

[5] J.M. Keller, X. Wang, A Fuzzy Rule-Based Approach to Scene Description Involving Spatial Relationships. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 80 (2000), pp.21-41.

DOI: 10.1006/cviu.2000.0872

Google Scholar

[6] S. Du, Q. Qin, Q. Wang, The spatial relations in GIS and their applications. Earth Science Frontiers, Vol. 13 (2006), pp.69-80.

Google Scholar

[7] X. Du, J. Xiong, Equivalency evaluation model of spatial topological relations in multiple scale representation. Science of Surveying and Mapping, Vol. 32 (2007), pp.70-72.

Google Scholar

[8] S.H. Choe, J.H. Park, S. -S. Pyo, Hierarchical Spatial Relation Based on a Contiguity Graph. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 20 (2005), pp.867-892.

DOI: 10.1002/int.20096

Google Scholar

[9] D. Papadias, M.J. Egenhofer, HierarchicalSpatial Reasoning about Direction Relations. GeoInformatica, Vol. 1 (2007), pp.251-273.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Fonseca, M. Egenhofer, P. Agouris, et al., Semantic Granularity in Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36 (2002), pp.121-151.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Egenhofer, R. Franzosa, On the Equivalence of Topological Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 9(1995), pp.133-152.

DOI: 10.1080/02693799508902030

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Guo, H. Ding, H. Liu, X. Liu. Combinational Reasoning of Spatial Topological Relations between Two Areas Based on Basic Spatial Relations. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, Vol. 30(2005), pp.728-731.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Berretti, A. Del Bimbo, and E. Vicario, Modeling Spatial Relationships between Color Sets. In: IEEE Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Libraries, 2000, pp.73-77.

DOI: 10.1109/ivl.2000.853843

Google Scholar