Negotiation Protocol for Location Privacy

Abstract:

As metropolitan areas have expanded and been surrounded by huge buildings and complicated express ways, it has been increased to utilize advanced ICT(Information Computer Technology) devices and systems to innovate utility services such as GIS(Geographic Information System). Keeping abreast of this, location privacy has emerged as a critical issue in ubiquitous computing environments for the metropolitan areas. Nevertheless, the focus of the location privacy is only about personal location information, not about location information such as the place itself. However, in a real world, as seen in the precedent of ‘Dow Chemical vs. United States’ or in controlled areas of military districts, we have already recognized the importance of location information. In this paper, we propose a negotiation protocol to protect location information as well as personal location information. Thus, we can achieve real data protection through the negotiation-process in the respect of self-regulation.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 519-520)
• Pages: 957-964
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.519-520.957
• Online since: February 2014
• Authors: Hyun A. Park, Hyung Seok Kim, Jee In Kim*
• Keywords: Information Security, Location Privacy, Negotiation Protocol, Personal Location Privacy

References

[1] M. Bennicke, Towards automatic negotiation of privacy contracts for internet services, Networks, 2003. ICON2003. The 11th IEEE International Conference on, pp.319-324, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/icon.2003.1266210

[2] A. R. Beresford and F. Stajano, Location Privacy in Pervasive Computing, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Volume 2 Issue 1, Page 46-55, January (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/mprv.2003.1186725

[3] S. Chakraborty, S. K. Sharma, A. K. Pal, Privacy-Preserving 1-n-p Negotiation Protocol, HICSS '08 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Page 479, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2008.355

[4] Wu, Chen and Potdar, Vidyasagar and Chang, Elizabeth, A conceptual framework for privacy policy negotiation in web services, Sixth International Network Conference, pp.195-202, (2006).

[5] N. Doty and E. Wilde, Simple Policy Negotiation for Location Disclosure, W3C Workshop on Privacy and Data Usage Control, Cambridge, Massachusetts, October (2010).

[6] L. Fritsch, Privacy-Respecting Location-Based Service Infrastructures: A Socio-Technical Approach to Requirements, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 2, issue 3, pp.1-17, december, (2007).

DOI: 10.3390/jtaer2030018

[7] O. Jorns, , G. Quirchmayr, and O. Jung, (2007). A Privacy Enhancing Mechanism based on Pseudonyms for Identity Protection in Location-Based Services, Fifth Australasian Information Security Workshop, pp.133-142, (2007).

[8] R. Shokri, G. Theodorakopoulos, J. -Y. Le Boudec, and J. -P. Hubaux. Quantifying location privacy. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, USA, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/sp.2011.18

[9] D. Song, D. Wagner, and A. Perrig, Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp.44-55, (2000).

DOI: 10.1109/secpri.2000.848445

[10] J. Zibuschka, T. Scherner, L. Fritsch, K. Rannenberg, Towards a Unified Interface for Privacy Regulation-conformant Location-based Services, W3C Workshop on Languages for Privacy Policy Negotiation and Semantics-Driven Enforcement, Ispra, Italy, (2006).

[11] http: /www. law. go. kr/engLsInfoPWah. do?lsiSeq=85238.

[12] http: /supreme. justia. com/cases/federal/us/476/227/case. html.

[13] http: /www. opencongress. org/bill/112-s1223/show.