Ultrasound Assisted Removal of Unstable Form of Cu and Ni from Contaminated Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

Heavy metals exist in different forms in polluted soils however only the unstable form is bioavailable and potentially threatening to the environment. This study adopted the ultrasound technique as a tool to transform the unstable heavy metal forms into soluble forms and remove them. Acoustic cavitation coupled with mechanical stirring was used to facilitate the removal of Cu and Ni from a polluted soil. Effect of sonication treating time, sonication power and slurry concentration factors on the removal efficiency (RE) were studied. Test results show that the RE increase with sonication treating time, the best RE for Cu and Ni are 40-50 minutes and 30-40 minutes respectively. Increasing the sonication power can improve the removal of Cu but particularly for Ni, the optimal sonication power is 400W. High concentration slurry is better for Cu removal but for Ni, a more dilute slurry is more effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

678-681

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Perrodin, M. Babut, J. Bedell, et al. Assessment of ecotoxicological risks related to depositing dredged materials from canals in northern France on soil. Environ. Int. 32(2006)804-814.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.003

Google Scholar

[2] G. Dermont, M. Bergeron, G. Mercier, et al. Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 152(2008)1-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043

Google Scholar

[3] C. Garbisu and I. Alkorta. Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour. Technol. 77(2001) 29-236.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00108-5

Google Scholar

[4] D. Dermatas, X. Meng. Utilization of fly ash for stabilization solidification of heavy metal contaminated soils. Eng. Geol. 70(2003)377-394.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(03)00105-4

Google Scholar

[5] J. Virkutyt, M. Sillanpaa, and P. Latostenmaa. Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview. Science of The Total Environmen. Sci. Total Environ. 289(2002)97-121.

DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01027-0

Google Scholar

[6] K.S. Suslick. The Chemical Effects of ultrasound. Sci. Am. (1989)80-86.

Google Scholar

[7] A.F. Collings, A.D. Farmer, P.B. Gwan, et al. Processing contaminated soils and sediments by high power ultrasound. Miner. Eng. 19(2006)450-453.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2005.07.014

Google Scholar

[8] J.N. Meegoda, R. J. Perera. Ultrasound to decontaminate heavy metals in dredged sediments.J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 85(2001)73-89.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00222-9

Google Scholar