A New Ecological Flow Assessment Method Based on Spatial-Temporal Variability and Transferability

Article Preview

Abstract:

To solve transferability and spatial-temporal variability problems of ecological flow (EF) criteria existed in traditional Tennant methods, a new modified Tennant method was proposed. Considering the temporal variability and influence of extreme flows on average annual flow, the EF criteria for every month and water year were set as variables, and median monthly flow was taken as the optimum EF ceiling. Considering transferability and spatial variation of ecological objectives in different water function zones, the mean of monthly flow under 95% guaranteed rate and minimum monthly flow was used as the minimum EF. To avoid arbitrary use of EF criteria at all levels, the idea of arithmetic progression was introduced. On achieving satisfactory verification, the new approach was applied in the Hanjiang River as a case study. It is found that this new approach is reasonable with excellent spatial-temporal variability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

791-794

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.E. Tharme: River Research and Applications, Vol. 19 (2003) No. 5-6, p.397.

Google Scholar

[2] D.L. Tennant: Fisheries, Vol. 1 (1976) No. 4, p.6.

Google Scholar

[3] Ministry of Water Resources: Assessment Guidelines for Water-draw and Utilization in Construction Projects of Water Resources and Hydropower (China Water & Power Press 2011).

Google Scholar

[4] Z.H. Zheng, Q. Huang, M.H. Wei and L. Yu: Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), Vol. 42 (2010) No. 6, p.38. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] J.H. Tian, Y. Wang, S.N. Ru, Y.C. Yuan and W. Tian: Yellow River, Vol. 33 (2011) No. 11, p.100. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] B.H. Men, C.M. Liu, J. Xia, S.X. Liu and L.N. Ji: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 19 (2005) No. 5, p.135. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] R.J. Mathews and Y.X. B: Rivers, Vol. 2 (1991) No. 4, p.295.

Google Scholar

[8] B.H. Men and H.M. Ji: Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, Vol. 1 (2007) No. 1, p.19. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Z.F. Yang, J.L. Liu, T. Sun and B.S. Cui: Environmental Flows in Basins (Science Press, China 2006).

Google Scholar

[10] T. Hatfield: A Review of Environmental Flow Methods for Use in the British Columbia Winter Flows Project (Ecofish Research Ltd., England 2012).

Google Scholar

[11] Y.D. Yang and W.H. Chen: Small Hydro Power, Vol. 6 (2011), p.31. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Chen and W. Huang: Theory of River Health Assessment and Its Application in the Yangtse River (Changjiang Press, China 2010).

Google Scholar

[13] L.J. Yu, Z.Q. Xia and X.S. Du: Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), Vol. 32 (2004) No. 1, p.18. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Interim Regional Policy for New England Stream Flow Recommendations (Region 5 of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, America 1981).

Google Scholar

[15] D. Caissie and N. El-Jabi: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22 (1995) No. 2, p.235.

Google Scholar

[16] D.Y. Lu, P.G. Liu, T.Y. Fan, H. Peng and Z.K. Zhang: Research of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 13 (2000) No. 2, p.28. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar