Research on Field Simulation Application in Warship Cabin Performance-Based Fire Protection Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

As the rapid development of warship equipment automation, warship cabin fire protection design in many developed countries has transformed from the prescription approach to Performance-based Fire Protection Design (PFPD). Since the warship is moving offshore structures, its PFPD can fully learn from building PFPD on land. This paper firstly outlined the concepts and methods of building PFPD. Through comparing the similarities and differences of structure and fire-fighting capacity both on warships and in building, the warship cabin PFPD roadmap was proposed. From the perspectives of warship structure and personnel protection, warship PFPD parameters were proposed. Applied field simulation model into quantitative and numerical analysis of the fire compartments and adjacent ones to determine the cabins not meeting the demands of PFPD parameters. According to the analysis, take active or passive optimization fire protection measures making these compartments optimized design to meet structure fireproof parameters, ultimately achieve the fire protection purpose.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

325-330

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yinqing Li. Building Performance-based Fire Protection Design [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004: 1–94.

Google Scholar

[2] Haobo Wang, Ran Huo, Longhua Hu. Fire Science and Technology, 2003, 22(4): 281–284.

Google Scholar

[3] Yun Yang, Heping Zhang, Qingwen Zhang. China Safety Science Journal, 2003, 13(6): 29–32.

Google Scholar

[4] Shujiang Liao, Qicai Luo. Fire Science and Technology, 2004, 23(3): 249–251.

Google Scholar

[5] Jiawu Xia, Jinyun Pu, Yilun Cai. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2002, 4(14): 34-38.

Google Scholar

[6] Lizhong Yang, Weifeng Fang. China Safety Science Journal, 2001, 10(6): 63-67.

Google Scholar