Influences of Tennis Shoe Sole with Different Materials on Athletes’ Movement

Zi Xin Zhu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.525.77

Paper Titles

Preparation of Ni-Co Alloy by Electrodeposition
p.58

Progress of High Purity Magnesium Oxide Preparation
p.62

The Preparation of Ordered Mesoporous Al₂O₃ and its Application in Ni-Based Catalysts for CH₄/CO₂ Reforming
p.66

Research on the Grinding Crack Causes and the Preventive Measures of the Solid Carbide End Milling Cutter
p.73

Influences of Tennis Shoe Sole with Different Materials on Athletes’ Movement
p.77

Promote the Development of Tennis through Applied New Macromolecule Polymer Material in Tennis Racket Design
p.81

Comparative Study on the Composites with Chopped Different Parts of Rice Straw as Raw Materials
p.85

The Sensitive Fluorimetric Method for the Determination of Curcumin Using the Enhancement of Mixing Micelle
p.89

Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Sulphonic Acid Oxime Esters Catalyzed by 2-(1H-Benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-Tetramethyluronium Tetrafluoroborate
p.93

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 525Influences of Tennis Shoe Sole with Different...

Influences of Tennis Shoe Sole with Different Materials on Athletes’ Movement

Abstract:

Different sole materials impose very important influences on athletes movement effects. Sole materials of tennis shoes to a large extent decide athletes start and sudden stop etc. Through the study of the influences of common abrasion resistant rubber, DRC abrasion resistant rubber and adiWEAR composite of tennis shoe soles on non-slip performance of the tennis shoes, it is concluded that DRC abrasion resistant rubber has the best effect on sudden stop of athletes; common abrasion resistant rubber is more beneficial to abrupt changes in athletes movement than adiWEAR composite, but in terms of start and acceleration, common abrasion resistant rubber is worse than adiWEAR composite. Meanwhile, common abrasion resistant rubber has better support effects for long-time competitions and is more beneficial to diversified movement changes of athletes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 525)

Pages:

77-80

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.525.77

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Zi Xin Zhu*

Keywords:

Athlete, Material, Movement, Tennis Shoe Sole

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Du Shaoxun, Wu Jie. Study of functional relationship between ground conditions and outsole pattern of the gym shoes: Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Vol. 24(2004), pp.16-18.

Google Scholar

[2] Nigg， B，Bahlsen， H，Luethi，S，et al. The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running. J Biomech. Vol. 20(1987), pp.95-105.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90324-1

Google Scholar

[3] Yu Xueming, Prospect of polyurethane in shoemaking materials. Special Purpose Rubber Products. Vol. 6(1988), pp.58-62.

Google Scholar

[4] Chen Fuhua, Biomechanics research of tennis shoe sole structure and function. Science & Technology Information. Vol. 17(2013), pp.241-243.

Google Scholar

[5] Wang Zhifei, Xu Peng and Man Na: Teaching Reform and Practice of Operating System Courses. Computer Education. Vol. 6 (2008), pp.107-108.

Google Scholar

[6] Luo Tingting: The Application of Multimedia in Mathematics Teaching. Science and Technology Information. Vol. 3 (2008), P. 133-138.

Google Scholar

[7] Geng Yuxia, Qu Yuxiang: The Research on Educational Reform and Practice in Mathematics Teaching of Higher Vocational School. Education and Vocation. Vol. 3 (2009), pp.22-24.

Google Scholar