Research on the Latest Maneuver Moment of Aircraft and the Minimum Safety Distance between Aircrafts in Free Flight

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to guarantee the safety of flight in free flight environment, the minimum safety distance is needed to study. Considering the response delay of pilots and the lead time prior to initiating a maneuver, the latest maneuver moment is proposed. The position errors, which were affected by communication, navigation and surveillance (CNS) performances, were regarded as Brownian motion along the coordinate direction respectively. Then a model for collision risk in free flight environment was established basing on the stochastic differential equations. The latest maneuver moment can be obtained using dichotomy to optimize under the given Target Level of Safety (TLS). Introducing the time margin, the minimum safety distance is calculated. Finally, the feasibility of the model is verified by example.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

134-145

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Final Report of RTCA Task Force 3-Free Flight Implementation [R]. Washington DC: RTCA Inc (1995).

Google Scholar

[2] Rick Cassell, Alex Smith, Roger Shepherd, A Risk Assessment Model for Free Flight Terminal Area Reduced Separation, Proceeding of the1996 15thAIAA/ IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Atlanta (1996), pp.73-80.

DOI: 10.1109/dasc.1996.559138

Google Scholar

[3] Daniel Mosquera-Benitez, Alan Ross Groskreutze, Lars Fucke, Separation minima model: How change in Contributing Factors Could Affect Current Standards, Eighth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2009), United States (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] Mariken H. C. Everdij, Henk A. P. Blom, Bert G. A. J. Bakker, Modeling Lateral Separation and Separation for Airborne Separation Assurance Using Petri Nets Simulation, vol. 83(2007), pp.401-414.

DOI: 10.1177/0037549706063820

Google Scholar

[5] Zhaoning Zhang, Jinwei Shen, Jimin Liu, Lateral collision risk model based on CNS position error, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, vol. 9(2009), pp.110-113, In Chinese.

DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2010.5498338

Google Scholar

[6] Zhaoning Zhang, Jimin Liu, Lili Wang, Assessment of Longitudinal Collision Risk on Parallel Routes Based on Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Performances, Journal of SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY, vol. 44(2009), pp.918-925, In Chinese.

DOI: 10.1109/car.2010.5456620

Google Scholar

[7] Jimin Liu, Zhaoning Zhang, Jinwei Shen, Assessment of Lateral Collision Risk on Parallel Routes Based on Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance Performances, Aeronautical Computing Technique, vol. 39 (2009), pp.14-18, In Chinese.

DOI: 10.1109/car.2010.5456620

Google Scholar

[8] Ming Cai, Zhaoning Zhang, Lili Wang, Research on Collision Risk in Free Flight, Aeronautical Computing Technique, vol. 41(2011), pp.51-56, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhaoning Zhang, Jiangli Zuo, Study on Free Flight Collision Risk Based ON Brownian Motion, China safety Science Journal, vol. 22(2012), pp.43-47, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhaoning Zhang, Yiming Wang, Research on Collision Risk in Free Flight Based on Fuzzy Stochastic Differential Equations, China safety Science Journal, vol. 22(2012), pp.14-18, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhaoning Zhang, Lili Wang, Dongbin Li, Introduction to Security Assessment on Airborne Separation, Science Press, Beijing(2009), pp.147-165, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Doc 9869-AN/462, Manual on required communication performance (RCP), International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] ICAO, Doc 9613-AN/937, Manual on required navigation performance[S]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, Second Edition (1999).

Google Scholar

[14] PAVLICEVIC F, Euro control perspectives on required surveillance performance (RSP), Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, SASP/WG/WHL/8, WP/05(2005).

Google Scholar

[15] Li Zhang, Shudong Huang, Aiwu He, HongYang, Human Reliability Analysis Method, China safety Science , vol. 3(2001), pp.6-15, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] G.J. (Bert) Bakker , Henk A.P. Blom, Air Traffic Collision Risk Modeling, Proceeding of the 32nd Conference on Decision Control, San Antonio(1993), pp.1464-1469.

Google Scholar