Ecological Aquaculture Wastewater Purification Engineering Design of Microcirculation Running Water Breeding System

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study finds that the four kinds of aquatic plants of Ipomoea aquatica (IA), Eichhornia crassipes (EC), Alternanthera philoxeroides (AP) and Sagittaria sagittifolia (SS) have the significant effect on the purification of aquaculture wastewater through the contrast monitoring in the outdoor natural environment condition. The removal rates of the four kinds of aquatic plants are 91.37%, 94.27%, 58.64%, 90.26%, 92.67%, 100%;87.41%, 94.69%, 54.09%, 82.82%, 88.36%, 100%;83.09%, 94.91%, 51.36%, 86.67%, 87.36%, 100%;93.52%, 95.59%, 60.45%, 90.68%, 93.58%, 100% respectively to TN, TP, CODMn, NH4+-N, NO3--N, NO2--N in 10d trial period. On this basis, this study uses the aquatic plants, ozone measurement and control instrument and pump to build an ecological aquaculture wastewater purification system, it is applied in the high density running water breeding of the Clarias leather, channel catfish, grass carp and Odontobutis potamophila. We harvest the adult fish 47.2 Kg per square meter, the output value is 566.91 yuan and the profit is 136.76 yuan, so it has the significant economic and ecological benefits and it explores a new model for the development of "water-saving, zero emissions" aquaculture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

838-842

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] FAO. Aquaculture production 1998-General notes: The definition of aquaculture(p.3). FAO Year Fish Stat. Aquacult. Prod, 2000 (86/2): 169.

Google Scholar

[2] Gowen , R.J. and Bradbury, N.B. The ecological impact of salmon farming in coastal waters: a review [J]. Ocean ogr, Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev, 1987, 25: 563-575.

Google Scholar

[3] Mats Wallin and Lars Håkanson. Morphometry and sedimentation as regulating factors for nutrient recycling and trophic state in coastal waters [J]. Hydrobiologia, 1992, 7: 33-45.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2783-7_3

Google Scholar

[4] Lefebvre S, et al. Modeling approach of nitrogen and phosphorus exchanges at the sediment water interface of an intensive fishpond system[J]. Aquaculture 2001 , 195: 279-297.

DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(00)00560-3

Google Scholar

[5] Funge-Smith, Briggs M R P. Nutrient budgets in intensive shrimp ponds: Implications for sustainability. Aquaculture, 1998, 164(18): 117-133.

DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(98)00181-1

Google Scholar

[6] Md. Shahidul Islam, Nitrogen and phosphorus budget in coastal and marine cage aquaculture and impacts of effluent loading on ecosystem: review and analysis towards model development, Marine Pollution Bulletin. 50 (2005): 48-61.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.008

Google Scholar

[7] Reddy K R, Smith W H. Aquatic plants for water treatment and resource recovery [J]. Magnolia Publishing Inc, Orlando, FL. 1987, 1032.

Google Scholar

[8] Martin, et al. Shrimp rearing: stocking density, growth, impact on sediment, waste output and their relationships studied through the nutrition budget in rearing ponds [J]. Aquaculture, 1998, 164: 135-149.

DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(98)00182-3

Google Scholar

[9] Gowen R.J. Aquaculture and Environment. In: De Pauw N., JoyceJ . eds. Aquaculture and Environment. Ghent (Belgium): European Aquaculture Society Special Publication, (1992).

Google Scholar

[10] The State Environmental Protection Administration. Water and wastewater monitoring analysis method [M]. 4th edition. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002: 223-279.

Google Scholar