Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation on Driver's Hazard Perception

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fuzzy synthetic evaluation method is used to evaluate the drivers hazard perception., evaluation system is set up taking drivers psychological for hazard perception, the identification of hazard factor, hazard attitude as the criterion level. The indexs weight coefficient is determined by the analytic hierarchy process, and the fuzzy synthetic evaluation model is established. Through the model testing, if the driver's hazard perception ability evaluation result is good, according to the principle of maximum membership, it is shown that the driving experience, which is beneficial to the forming of the mature hazard perception psychology, the drivers hazard factors identification index deduced from the virtual scene experiment influenced the hazard perception ability deeply. Seen from the distribution of driver hazard perception level, the professional drivers and amateur drivers has the very big difference, so professional training and work experience are benefit for the driver's hazard perception ability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4354-4357

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A E af Wahlberg. Safety Science. (45) (2007), pp.487-500.

Google Scholar

[2] Jianqiang Gong, &Yuan Xiao, &Jianwei Shang. Journal of WuHan university of technology, 34(3) (2012), pp.1-6. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Zizi Guo, &Chongshuang Chen. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 42(1) (2012), pp.46-50. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Yanli Ma, &Yuli Pei. China journal of highway and transport, 22(1) (2009), pp.84-88. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Longhua Ma, &ZhilinTang, &Lin Cheng. Sciencepaper online, 6(11) (2011), pp.854-857. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Torbjrn Tronsmoen. Safety Science. (48) (2010), pp.35-45.

Google Scholar