Information Sharing, Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage to Supply Chain Management

Article Preview

Abstract:

We introduce a model to examine factors influencing Competitive Advantage and implementation in inter-firm. The model comprises nine research hypotheses with nine constructs, including Innovation Knowledge, Technology Creation, Quality Management, Resource, Communication, Opportunistic Behavior, Organizational Learning, Information Sharing and Competitive Advantage. The constructs are measured by well-supported measures in the literature. The hypotheses are tested via an empirical study of supply chains. Data used was based on 424 valid responses from Taiwans top manufacturing firms 2013. The results show Innovation Knowledge is the most important factors affecting Competitive Advantage success. Innovation Knowledge, Technology Creation, Quality Management, Resource, Communication, Opportunistic Behavior, Organizational Learning, Information Sharing and Competitive Advantage are integrated into and internalized by the whole organization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4428-4433

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42–58.

DOI: 10.1177/002224299005400103

Google Scholar

[2] Aurora Garrido-Moreno, Antonio Padilla-Melendez (2011) Analyzing the impact of knowledge management on CRM success: The mediating effects organizational factors, International Journal of Information Management, 31, pp.437-444.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.01.002

Google Scholar

[3] Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 238–246.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Google Scholar

[4] Bhaskaran (2006) Marketing professor joins judging panel, Food Magazine, Apr. 2006, pp.19-19. 1/3.

Google Scholar

[5] Chow, H. K. H., Choy, K. L., and Lee, W. B. (2007). A strategic knowledge-based planning system for freight forwarding industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 936–954.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.004

Google Scholar

[6] Claver-Cortes, E.; Pereira-Moliner, J.; Tari, J. J.; Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2008). TQM, managerial factors and performance in the Spanish hotel industry, Industrial Management and Data Systems 108(2): 228–244.

DOI: 10.1108/02635570810847590

Google Scholar

[7] Crone, M. and Roper, S. (2001), Local learning from multinational plants: knowledge transfers in the supply chain, Regional Studies, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp.535-548.

DOI: 10.1080/00343400120065705

Google Scholar

[8] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp.39-50.

DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104

Google Scholar

[9] Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed. ). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar

[10] Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000), Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp.357-365.

DOI: 10.1108/14691930010359252

Google Scholar

[11] Hartley, J, Benington, J (2006) Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks, Public Money and Management, vol. 26, issue 2, pp.101-108.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00508.x

Google Scholar

[12] Holland, C. P. (1995). Cooperative supply chain management: The impact of inter -organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4, 117–133.

DOI: 10.1016/0963-8687(95)80020-q

Google Scholar

[13] James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., and Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group inter rater reliabilities with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85

Google Scholar

[14] Johnson, J. L., and Sohi, R. S. (2001). The influence of firm predispositions on inter-firm relationship formation in business markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18, 299–318.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8116(01)00042-8

Google Scholar

[15] Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Google Scholar

[16] Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., and Jaeger, A. (2009) Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technologyirms – an empirical analysis of German industry, Research Policy, 38(3), pp.447-458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011

Google Scholar

[17] Szulanski, G. (1996), Exploring internal stickness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp.27-43.

DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250171105

Google Scholar

[18] Wathne, K.H. and Heide, J.B. (2000), Opportunism in inter-firm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp.36-51.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.64.4.36.18070

Google Scholar