New Product Development Model for Solar Cells

Article Preview

Abstract:

Global warming is a major reason for dramatic climate changes around the world. Among various renewable energy sources, solar energy is one of the most promising for environmental protection and natural resource scarcity resolution. With the technical advantages obtained from the semiconductor and TFT-LCD industries, the Photovoltaic (PV) industry in Taiwan can achieve a solid global position. Current PV products, however, still face a large obstacle due to high production cost and low PV conversion efficiency. An important source of competitive advantage, survival and renewal for firms in todays competitive market is successful new product development (NPD). PV firms need to carry out effective R&D in order to improve product quality and to obtain cost effectiveness. This research, thus, constructs a comprehensive model, which comprises fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and quality function deployment (QFD), for implementing a NPD project for a PV manufacturer. The proposed model shall help designers to systematically consider relevant NPD information and reconcile tradeoffs among various performance characteristics in a fuzzy environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

737-740

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. Hoffmann, PV solar electricity industry: market growth and perspective, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 90, 3285-3311 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.09.022

Google Scholar

[2] Applied Materials, Thin films solar cells (2008). http: /www. appliedmaterials. com/products/thin_films_solar_cells_5. html.

Google Scholar

[3] A.H.I. Lee, W.M. Wang and T.Y. Lin, An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 135-150 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.002

Google Scholar

[4] W.M. Wang, A.H.I. Lee and D. -T. Chang, An integrated FDM-ANP evaluation model for sustainable development of housing community, Optimization Letters, 4(2), 239-257 (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s11590-009-0164-3

Google Scholar

[5] P.C. Chang and Y.W. Wang, Fuzzy Delphi and back-propagation model for sales forecasting in PCB industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 30, 715-726 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.031

Google Scholar

[6] J.H. Cheng, Indexes of competitive power and core competence in selecting Asia-Pacific ports. Journal of Chinese Institute of Transportation, 13(1), 1-25, in Chinese (2001).

Google Scholar

[7] W.M. Wey and K.Y. Wu, Interdependent urban renewal project selection under the consideration of resource constraints. Environment and Planning B- Planning & Design, 35, 122-147 (2008).

DOI: 10.1068/b33045

Google Scholar

[8] R.J. Dzeng and K.S. Wen, Evaluating project teaming strategies for construction of Taipei 101 using resource-based theory. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 483-491(2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.004

Google Scholar

[9] Y.F. Kuo and P.C. Chen, Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 1930-1939 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068

Google Scholar

[10] L.K. Chan, H.P. Kao and M.L. Wu, Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37(11), 2499-2518 (1999).

DOI: 10.1080/002075499190635

Google Scholar

[11] N.R. Ramasamy and V. Selladurai, Fuzzy logic approach to prioritise engineering characteristics in quality function deployment (FL-QFD). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(9), 1012-1023 (2004).

DOI: 10.1108/02656710410561826

Google Scholar

[12] A. H. I. Lee and C. -Y. Lin, An integrated fuzzy QFD framework for new product development. Flexible Services and Manufacturing, 23, 26-47 (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/s10696-011-9076-5

Google Scholar