The Use of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Experimental Design of Membrane Treatment in Treating PW from Oil and Gas Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

Produced Water (PW) is a byproduct in the production of oil and gas. With various types of heavy metals and pollutants, it may harm human being and marine life. The objectives of this study are; 1) to study the performance of the fabricated membranes and 2) to verify the results by using the experimental design. The PW samples which is from Dulang field is treated using Polysulfone membranes that prepared by casting solutions consisting of polysulfone (PSf), N-methyl pyrrolidone (nmp), Bentonite, and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP). The influence of PVP (0-7wt%) and Bentonite (0-7wt%) addition were investigated in terms of PW Flux (mL/cm2h) and TDS rejection rate (%). The amount of TDS in PW sample is 12g/L and the PSF membrane successfully reduced it up to 14%. The experimental results then used in Central Composite Model (CCM) under RSM which designate parameters (X) as Operating Pressure (bar), PVP (wt%) and Bentonite (wt%) to compute the optimum response condition (Y) as PW Flux and and TDS rejection rate in Design Expert software. The optimum condition achieved by PSf membrane is where the composition of 4.5wt% PVP, 6.0wt% Bentonite and Operating Pressure of 5.0 bar were used. Both methods showed the value of TDS decreased up to 14% after run through the membranes for several hours. Experimental and predicted result (DoE) for optimum condition is then compared to verify the error. The percent error calculated is 2.4% and 25.5% for PW Flux and TDS Rejection Rate respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

206-210

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. E. G. Giacchetta, The Treatment of Produced Water, in Offshore Rig: Comparison Between Traditional Installations and Innovative Systems, Oil & Gas Journal, 7-(1996).

Google Scholar

[2] F. R. Ahmadun, A. Pendashteh, L. C. Abdullah, D. R. A. Biak, S. S. Madaeni, Z. Z. Abidin, Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazard Materials, 170(2009), 530-551.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044

Google Scholar

[3] M. Cakmak, N. Kayaalp, I. Koyunco, Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes. Desalination, 222(2008), 176-186.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.147

Google Scholar

[4] T. Hayes, D. Arthur, Overview of emerging produced water treatment technologies. Paper presented at the Proccedings of the 11th Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference, Albuquerque, Namibia (October 2004).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Idris, F. Kormin, M. Y. Nordin, Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane. Separation and Purification Technology, 49(2006), 271-280.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.10.010

Google Scholar

[6] S. Mondal, S. R. Wikramasinghe, Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 322(2008), 162-170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.039

Google Scholar

[7] Kune-Woo Lee, Bum-Kyoung Seo, Suk-Tae Namb, Myeong-Jin Han, Trade-off between thermodynamic enhancement and kinetic hindrance during phase inversion in the preparation of polysulfone membranes, Desalination 159 (2003) 289-296.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(03)90081-6

Google Scholar

[8] F. E., G. Giacchetta, The Treatment of Produced Water, in Offshore Rig: Comparison Between Traditional Installations and Innovative Systems, Oil & Gas Journal, 7(1996).

Google Scholar

[9] Yin Fong Yeong, Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah, Abdul Latif Ahmad, Subhash Bhatia Process optimization studies of p-xylene separation from binary xylene mixture over silicalite-1 membrane using response surface methodology Journal of Membrane Science 341 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.042

Google Scholar

[10] Al Akoum, Michel Y. Jaffrin, , Luhui Ding, Patrick Paullier, Clotilde Vanhoutte, An hydrodynamic investigation of microfiltration and ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module, Journal of Membrane Science 19 (2002): 37-52.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00602-0

Google Scholar

[11] Andre I. Khuri and Siuli Mukhopadhyay, Response surface methodology, WIREs Computational Statistics, (2010) John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 128-144.

DOI: 10.1002/wics.73

Google Scholar