Comparing Contact Pressure Induced by a Conventional Complete Denture and an Implant-Retained Overdenture

Article Preview

Abstract:

Implant-retained overdenture has been widely applied as a solution to edentulous ageing; however, a major concern for the denture wearers is bone resorption induced by the prosthetic interaction with soft tissue and bone. Early studies have revealed that the bone resorption is associated with the disturbance to the mucosa blood flow. This study aimed to investigate the contact pressure induced by an implant-retained overdenture, compared to a conventional complete denture without implants, which implies the potential bone resorption for clinical investigation. A three-dimensional finite element model of a full jaw, including mandible bone, mucosa, and denture, was created through a reverse engineering method based on CBCT images, in which the hyperelastic behaviour of mucosa was determined by curve-fitting to the clinical measurement, for a more realistic response. It is found that the location of the bone loss differed between the implant retained and non-implant complete dentures. With the implants, the denture displaced more at posterior ends towards the mucosa bearing area, leading to higher contact pressure accounted for more severe local bone loss.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

384-389

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Canger, E.M. and P. Çelenk, Radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge heights of dentate and edentulous patients. Gerodontology, 2012. 29(1): pp.17-23.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00391.x

Google Scholar

[2] Blum, I.R. and J.F. McCord, A clinical investigation of the morphological changes in the posterior mandible when implant-retained overdentures are used. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004. 15(6): pp.700-8.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01057.x

Google Scholar

[3] Jacobs, R., et al., Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implant-supported overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1992. 3(2): pp.63-70.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030203.x

Google Scholar

[4] Ahmad, R., et al., Three dimensional quantification of mandibular bone remodeling using standard tessellation language registration based superimposition. Clin Oral Implants Res, (2013).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02566.x

Google Scholar

[5] Assad Ahmed, S., M.A. Abd El-Dayem, and M. Badawy Magdy, Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures. . Implant Dentistry 2004. 13(4): pp.386-94.

DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000144512.43654.08

Google Scholar

[6] Reddy, M.S., et al., Mandibular growth following implant restoration: Does Wolff's law apply to residual ridge resorption? International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2002. 22(4): pp.315-322.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00274-9

Google Scholar

[7] Wright, P.S., et al., The effects of fixed and removable implant-stabilised prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2002. 13(2): pp.169-174.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130207.x

Google Scholar

[8] Sawada, A., et al., Viscoelasticity of Human Oral Mucosa: Implications for Masticatory Biomechanics. Journal of Dental Research, 2011. 90(5): pp.590-595.

DOI: 10.1177/0022034510396881

Google Scholar

[9] Kydd, W.L. and C.H. Daly, The biologic and mechanical effects of stress on oral mucosa. J Prosthet Dent, 1982. 47(3): pp.317-29.

Google Scholar

[10] Ashton, H., Effect of increased tissue pressure on blood flow. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1975(113): pp.15-26.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197511000-00004

Google Scholar

[11] Junning Chen, W.L., Michael Swain, Ali Darendeliler, Qing Li A Periodontal Ligament Driven Bone Remodeling Algorithm for Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Journal of Biomechanics, 2014. In Press.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.030

Google Scholar

[12] Li, W., et al., Fibre reinforced composite dental bridge. Part II: numerical investigation. Biomaterials, 2004. 25(20): pp.4995-5001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.011

Google Scholar

[13] Li, W., et al., Towards automated 3D finite element modeling of direct fiber reinforced composite dental bridge. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2005. 74B(1): pp.520-528.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30233

Google Scholar

[14] Carr, M.E. and S.L. Carr, Fibrin structure and cocentration alter clot elastic-modulus but do not alter platelet-mediated force development. Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 1995. 6(1): pp.79-86.

DOI: 10.1097/00001721-199502000-00013

Google Scholar

[15] O'Brien, W.J., Dental Materials and Their Selection. 2008, Michigan: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.

Google Scholar

[16] Isaksson, H., C.C. van Donkelaar, and K. Ito, Sensitivity of tissue differentiation and bone healing predictions to tissue properties. Journal of Biomechanics, 2009. 42(5): pp.555-564.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.001

Google Scholar

[17] Kanbara, R., et al., Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis: The technique and methodology of non-linear property simulation and soft tissue loading behavior for different partial denture designs. Dental Materials Journal, 2012. 31(2): pp.297-308.

DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2011-165

Google Scholar

[18] Lin, D., et al., Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant. Journal of Biomechanics, 2010. 43(2): pp.287-293.

Google Scholar

[19] Chen, J., et al., Multiscale design of surface morphological gradient for osseointegration. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2013. 20: pp.387-97.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.019

Google Scholar

[20] Rungsiyakull, C., et al., Effects of Occlusal Inclination and Loading on Mandibular Bone Remodeling: A Finite Element Study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2011. 26(3): pp.527-537.

Google Scholar

[21] Rungsiyakull, C., et al., Surface morphology optimization for osseointegration of coated implants. Biomaterials, 2010. 31(27): pp.7196-7204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.077

Google Scholar

[22] Hart, R.T., et al., Modeling the Biomechanics of the Mandible - a 3-Dimensional Finite-Element Study. Journal of Biomechanics, 1992. 25(3): pp.261-286.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90025-v

Google Scholar

[23] Assuncao, W.G., et al., Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2008. 35(10): pp.766-774.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01851.x

Google Scholar

[24] Field, C., et al., Prediction of mandibular bone remodelling induced by fixed partial dentures. Journal of Biomechanics, 2010. 43(9): pp.1771-1779.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.016

Google Scholar