Component-Based Ranking Strategy for Evolutionary Optimization with Sparse Constraints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most constraint-handling methods in constrained evolutionary optimization usually take advantage of only the valuable information of feasible solutions, while they don’t exploit adequately the information from infeasible ones. In this paper, a concept of “feasible component” is introduced to recognize the characteristics of diverse information extracted from infeasible solutions. Then a component-based ranking strategy is proposed for evolutionary optimization with sparse constraints by integrating feasible components and the idea of stochastic ranking. Experimental results on several problems with sparse constraints show that the component-based ranking strategy performs better than the stochastic ranking.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3925-3929

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Mezura-Montes and C. Coello, A simple multimembered evolution strategy to solve constrained optimization problems, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2005 9(1) 1-17.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2004.836819

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Cai and Y. Wang, A multiobjective optimization-based evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2006 10(6) 658–675.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2006.872344

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Wang, Z. Cai, G. Guo and Y. Zhou, Multiobjective optimization and hybrid evolutionary algorithm to solve constrained optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics. 2007 37(3) 560–575.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2006.886164

Google Scholar

[4] G. Jia, Y. Wang, Z. Cai and Y. Jin, An improved (μ + λ)-constrained differential evolution for constrained optimization, Information Science. 2013 222 302-322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.01.017

Google Scholar

[5] C. Coello, Theoretical and numerical constraint handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2002 191(11-12) 1245-1287.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(01)00323-1

Google Scholar

[6] S. Koziel and Z. Michalewicz, Evolutionary algorithms, homomorphous mappings, and constrained parameter optimization, Evolutionary Computation. 1999 7(1) 19-44.

DOI: 10.1162/evco.1999.7.1.19

Google Scholar

[7] T. Runarsson and X. Yao, Search biases in constrained evolutionary optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2005 35(2) 233-243.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcc.2004.841906

Google Scholar