Evaluation of Indoor Thermal Environment in a Radiant-Cooled-Floor Office Building in Malaysia

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the findings of a thermal comfort survey conducted in a tropical green office building. The building was installed with a slab-integrated radiant cooling system, which operated concurrently with an integrated variable-air-volume system. Evaluation of indoor thermal environment was made, where both objective and subjective assessments were carried out. The air temperature, air velocity, relative humidity and surface temperatures were measured by using calibrated sensors. Based on the data collected from the field assessment, the thermal comforts indices with expectancy factor were calculated. The results showed that thermal comfort parameters were within the comfort range specified in a local guideline, except for the air velocity profile. Besides, discrepancy between the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) with expectancy factor and Actual Mean Vote (AMV) was found, which showed that the former still overestimated the thermal sensation of occupants although an expectancy factor of 0.5 was used.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

228-233

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K.W. Tham, Thermal Comfort. Building and Environment Vol. 28 (3) (1993) 287 – 299.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Daghigh, N.M. Adam and B.B. Sahari, European Journal of Scientific Research Vol. 25 (2) (2009) 174-191.

Google Scholar

[3] Q.J. Kwong, N.M. Adam and B.B. Sahari, Energy Performance Evaluation of a Radiant Slab Cooling System in a Tropical Green Building, 11th REHVA World Congress & 8th International Conference on IAQVEC (2013), Paper ID 1051.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Song, T. Kim, S. Song, S. Hwang and S.B. Leight, Applied Thermal Engineering Vol. 28 (2008) 1299-1311.

Google Scholar

[5] R.J. de Dear, K.G. Leow and S.C. Foo, Biometeorology Vol. 34 (1991) 259 – 265.

Google Scholar

[6] N.H. Wong and S.S. Khoo, Energy and Buildings Vol. 35 (2003) 337 – 351.

Google Scholar

[7] A.G. Kwok, ASHRAE Transactions Vol. 104 (1B) (1998) 1031 – 1047.

Google Scholar

[8] P.O. Fanger and J. Toftum, Energy and Buildings Vol. 34 (2002) 533 – 536.

Google Scholar

[9] ASHRAE Standard 55-2004: Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers, Atlanta (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] Malaysian Standard (MS) 1525: Code of Practice on Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for Non-residential Buildings, Department of Standards Malaysia (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 7730: Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment, Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria. International Organization for Standardization (2005).

DOI: 10.3403/30046382

Google Scholar

[12] J.L. Kenkell, Introductory Statistics for Management and Economics, Cincinnati, South-Western Pub. (1989).

Google Scholar

[13] T.H. Karyono, Building and Environment, Vol. 35 (2000) 77 – 90.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Tsutsumi, S. Tanabe, J. Harigaya, Y. Iguchi and G. Nakamura, Building and Environment Vol. 42 (2007) 4034 – 4042.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.037

Google Scholar

[15] K.W.D. Cheong, E. Djunaedy, Y.L. Chua, K.W. Tham, S.C. Sekhar, N.H. Wong and M.B. Ullah, Building and Environment Vol. 38 (2003) 63 – 73.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(02)00020-3

Google Scholar