The Effects of TiAlN and TiN Coating during End Milling of INCONEL 718

Article Preview

Abstract:

Inconel 718 is a registered trademark of Special Metals Corporation that refers to a family of austenitic nickel-chromium-based super alloys. This material usually being used or operate in high temperature and extreme condition like aerospace industry, turbocharger rotors and seals. This research presents an experimental study of the cutting force variation, surface roughness, tool life and tool wear in end milling Inconel 718. The experimental results showed that flank wear was the predominant failure mode affecting tool life for TiAlN and TiN coated carbide tool. TiAlN is the better coated tool than TiN because it produce better surface finish and resultant force. Feed rate is one of the parameter that effecting results in this experiment. The higher feed rate will shorten the life of the tool. Although for the cutting condition, the situation is quite different where the proper cutting speed will maintain the tool life and tool wear for cutting tool. The overall study shows that TiAlN coated carbide tool with cutting speed 100 m/min, depth of cut 0.5 mm and feed rate 0.1 mm/tooth is the optimum parameter in this experiment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

566-571

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. M'Saoubi, J.C. Outeiro, H. Chandrasekaran, O.W. Dillon Jr., I.S. Jawahir, Int. J. of Sustainable Manufacturing 1 (1–2) (2008) 203–236.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.B. Guo, W. Li, I.S. Jawahir, Mach. Sc. and Tech. 13 (2009) 437–470.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Devillez, F. Schneider, S. Dominiak, D. Dudzinskim, D. Larrouquere, Wear 262 (2007) 931 – 942.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.10.009

Google Scholar

[4] Y.S. Liao, H.M. Lin, J.H. Wang, J. of Mat. Processing Tech. 201 (2008). 460 – 465.

Google Scholar

[5] H.Z. Li, H. Zeng, X.Q. Chen, J. of Mat. Processing Tech. 180 (2006) 296 -304.

Google Scholar

[6] E. P. Degarmo, J Temple, R.A. Kohser, Cutting tools for machining, Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, 7th ed., Macmillan Publish., 1984, 547 – 566.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Nalbant, A. Altin, H. Gokkaya, J. of M. and Design 28 (2007) 1334-1338.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Nalbant, A. Altin, H. Gokkaya, J. of Mat. and Design (2006) 1719 – 1724.

Google Scholar

[9] R.S. Pawade, S.S. Joshi, P.K. Brahmankarand, M. Rahman, J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 192 – 193 (2007) 139 – 146.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Arunamacalam, M.A. Manan, Mach. Sc. and Tech. 4(1) (2000) 127-138.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Sun, M. Brandt, M.S. Dargusch, Int. Journal of Mach. Tools and Manu 50 (2010) 933-942.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Shokrani, V. Dhokia, S.T. Newman, Int. J. of Mach. Tools and Manu. (2012).

Google Scholar

[13] L. Li, N. He, M. Wang, Z.G. Wang, J. Proc. Tech. 129 (2002) 127 – 130.

Google Scholar