Evaluation of Roofing Systems in Malaysia Based on MS 1553 BS 6399, EC1-1-4 and IS 875 Wind Codes

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper evaluates the performance of different roofing sheet systems for different roof types using four different codes namely MS 1553, EC1-1-4, IS 875 and BS 6399. The maximum roof pressures using different codes (MS 1553, EC1-1-4, IS 875 and BS 6399) on critical and general area of the different roof types considering buildings with non-dominant opening, dominant opening and canopies have been evaluated. The maximum recommended wind speed in MS 1553 namely 33.5 m/s has been used as the reference for the numerical comparison. The major differences in the codes include averaging time for wind speed, terrain, reference height, and pressure coefficients. The study examines the conservativeness or not of the codes if used in the Malaysian context, even though they have been developed for a different wind climate and region. Further, the results of static test on different steel roofing sheets used in Malaysia using AS 1562.1 available as the limit state wind pressure capacities in the technical brochures are compared with design wind pressures for critical and interior regions of the roof for different wind zones. The suitability of a particular roofing sheet system for a particular wind zone is then assessed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

577-582

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. E. Minor, K. C. Mehta, and J. R. McDonald, Failures of structures due to extreme winds, ASCE J. of structural division, 98(11), 1972, 2459-2473.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0003375

Google Scholar

[2] Narayanan. S and Mathews,M. S , 1996, Behaviour of Roofs of Industrial Structures to cyclonic Wind Loads, INCODIM, Chennai, January.

Google Scholar

[3] Narayanan. S and Mathews,M. S, 2002, Cyclone Resistant Industrial Buildings Through Planning Design and Construction, 2nd World Engineering Congress, Kuching , Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[4] Narayanan. S and Mathews,M. S, 2002, Improving Cyclone Resistant Characteristics of Roof Cladding of Industrial Sheds In India, 2nd World Engineering Congress, Kuching , Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[5] Narayanan, S and Mathews, M. S, 2003, Engineering Roofing Systems for Cyclone Resistance, International Seminar on Industrial Structures, Coimbatore, India, Proceedings, p.46.

Google Scholar

[6] Narayanan, S and Mathews, M. S, 2003, Wind Loads on Roof Claddings of Industrial Sheds in India, International Seminar on Industrial Structures, Coimbatore, India, Proceedings, p.47.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Narayanan, Improving Cyclone Resistant Characteristics of Roof Cladding of Industrial Sheds, doctoral diss., IIT Madras, India, (1999).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Narayanan and M. S. Mathews, Behaviour of Roofing Sheet Systems under Static Uplift Loads, IE, India, Civil, 2003, 216 – 222.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Mahendran, Wind Resistant Low Rise Buildings in the Tropics, ASCE J. of Performance of Constructed facilities, 9(4), 1995 330-346.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(1995)9:4(330)

Google Scholar

[10] AS 1562. 1-1992, Design and Installation of Sheet Roof and Wall Cladding.

Google Scholar

[11] MS 1553-2002, Code of Practice on Wind Loading for Building Structure.

Google Scholar

[12] BS 6399-2: 1997, Loading for buildings. Wind loads (Technical Committee B/525, 1997).

Google Scholar

[13] EC1-1-4: 2005, Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures – General Actions – Wind Actions.

DOI: 10.3403/03252196u

Google Scholar

[14] IS 875-3-1987, Design Loads for Buildings and structures (Bureau of Indian Standards).

Google Scholar

[15] AS 4040. 2-1992, Methods of Testing Sheet roof and Wall Cladding.

Google Scholar

[16] Lysaght HR-29, Steel Roofing & Walling Profile. Technical Brochure.

Google Scholar

[17] Custom Orb Custom Blue Orb, Traditional Corrugated Steel Cladding. Technical Brochure.

Google Scholar

[18] Lysaght Klip-Lok Optima, The Widest Concealed-Fixed Cladding. Technical Brochure.

Google Scholar

[19] Lysaght Spandek Optima, Trapezoidal Steel Cladding with Longer Spanning Capability. Technical Brochure.

Google Scholar

[20] Lysaght Trimdek Optima, Subtle Square Fluted Steel Cladding with Extra-wide Span, Technical Brochure.

Google Scholar

[21] AISC 325, Steel Construction Manual (American Institute of Steel Construction, 2011).

Google Scholar

[22] Lysaght Spandek, Roofing and Walling Solutions. Technical Brochure.

Google Scholar

[23] K. Seavhai and S. Narayanan, Roof Wind Pressures for Rectangular Low Rise Buildings Using MS 1553, EC1-1-4, BS 6399-2 and IS875-3, RASE 2013, December 13-15, India.

Google Scholar

[24] S. Narayanan, and K. Seavhai, Comparative Study of Roof Wind Pressures for Permeable Buildings, CHUSER 2014, 7-9 April, Penang, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[25] S. Narayanan, K. Seavhai and T. Wee, Building roofing sheets systems for different wind zones in Malaysia, ICMSC 2013, December 12-14, Kollam, India.

Google Scholar

[26] K. Seavhai and S. Narayanan, Roof Wind Pressures For Duopitch Roof Permeable Buildings, CHUSER 2014, 7-9 April, Penang, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[27] ASCE 7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

Google Scholar