The Relations between UT1 Precision and Radio Source Sky-Coverage

Article Preview

Abstract:

All INT2 sessions from 2002 to 2009 are calculated in this paper, the UT1 corrections calculated by the observations and the periodical change rules of its formal deviation are analyzed with Jurkevich and Fourier methods, and several cases about the corresponding radio source sky-coverage of INT2 sessions are pointed out. According to the results, the atmospheric excitation in summer probably influence the UT1 estimation about 1.5μs, and effective radio source sky-coverage can make up for the defects of few observation scan.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

106-113

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. B Zhang, G.L. Wang, X. Liu, Z.H. Tang, Analysis of EOP Determination via Chinese VLBI Network, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 38 (8): 911, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] G.L. Wang and M. H Xu. An Analysis of UT1 Determined by IVS Intensive Observations. Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36(4): 408{416, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chinastron.2012.10.006

Google Scholar

[3] Qian Zhihan, Wu Linda, Very Long Baseline Interferometry, Mapping Publishing Company, (1983).

Google Scholar

[4] K. Baver, D. MacMillan, L. Petrov, and et al. Analysis of the VLBI intensive sessions. International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry 2004 General Meeting Proceedings. NASA/CP-2004-212255, pages 394-398, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] K.D. Baver, J.M. Gipson, and D.S. MacMillan. Strategies for Improving the IVS-INT01 UT1 Estimates: Preliminary Results of RD0907 through RD0910. (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Vennebusch. Investigations on European Baseline Rates. In Proceedings of the 16th Working Meeting on European VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry, held at Leipzig, May, volume 9, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Vennebusch, A. Nothnagel, and H. Kutterer. Singular value decomposition and cluster analysis as regression diagnostics tools for geodetic applications. Journal of Geodesy, 83(9): 877- 891, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s00190-009-0306-5

Google Scholar

[8] M. Uunila, A. Nothnagel, and J. Leek. In ence of Source Constellations on UT1 Derived from IVS INT1 Sessions. In IVS 2012 General Meeting Proceedings, pp.395-399, volume 1, pages 395-399, (2013).

Google Scholar

[9] Z.B. Zhang, X. Liu, and J. N Gao. ZenithWet Delay Estimation and Radio Source Sky Coverage. Advanced Materials Research, 718: 593-599, (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.718-720.593

Google Scholar

[10] I. Jurkevich. A method of computing periods of cyclic phenomena. Astrophysics and Space Science, 13(1): 154-167, (1971).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00656321

Google Scholar

[11] D.N. Swingler. A comparison of the fourier, jurkevich, and stellingwerf methods of period estimation. The Astronomical Journal, 97: 280-287, (1989).

DOI: 10.1086/114981

Google Scholar