Recommend Strategies for E-Learning 2.0 Communities

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the rapid progress of Web 2.0, E-Learning has evolved into E-Learning 2.0, which has been highlighted as an effective method for interactive learning. To improve the efficiency of learning, many researches focused on the personalized recommendation for knowledge sharing. However, these researches proposed the general recommendation system without considering the current knowledge sharing status in E-learning 2.0 communities. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to proposed recommend strategies according to characteristics of E-Learning communities based on social network analysis. Firstly, knowledge activity nodes in E-Learning communities are identified into four types. Secondly, based on four node types, E-Learning communities are classified into four corresponding types. Then, different recommend strategies are provided according to the types of E-Learning communities. Finally, conclusion and future research direction are discussed in the end.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1547-1550

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gubbins, Claire; Dooley, Lawrence. Exploring Social Network Dynamics Driving Knowledge Management for Innovation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(2), pp.162-185 (2014).

DOI: 10.1177/1056492613499203

Google Scholar

[2] Aboelmaged, Mohamed Gamal. Linking operations performance to knowledge management capability: the mediating role of innovation performance. Production planning & Control, 25(1), pp.44-58 (2014).

DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2012.655802

Google Scholar

[3] Alsabawy, Ahmed Younis; Cater-Steel, Aileen; Soar, Jeffrey. IT infrastructure services as a requirement for e-learning system success. Computers & Education, 69, pp.431-451(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.035

Google Scholar

[4] Ho C L, Dzeng R J. Construction safety training via E-Learning: Learning effectiveness and user satisfaction. Computers & Education, 2010, 55(2): 858-867.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.017

Google Scholar

[5] Liu, Ying Chieh; Huang, Yu-An; Lin, Chad. Organizational Factors' Effects on the Success of E-Learning Systems and Organizational Benefits: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance learning, 13(4), pp.130-151(2012).

DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1203

Google Scholar

[6] Dwivedi, Pragya; Bharadwaj, Kamal K. Effective Trust-aware E-learning Recommender System based on Learning Styles and Knowledge Levels. Educational Technology& Society, 16(4), pp.201-216 (2013).

Google Scholar

[7] Palacios-Marques, Daniel; Cortes-Grao, Rocio; Lobato Carral, Clemente. Outstanding knowledge competences and web 2. 0 practices for developing successful e-learning project management. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), pp.14-21(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.002

Google Scholar

[8] Khodakarami, Farnoosh; Chan, Yolande E. Exploring the role of customer relationship management (CRM) systems in customer knowledge creation. Information & Management, 51(1), pp.27-42(2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2013.09.001

Google Scholar

[9] Lin, Hsiu-Fen. Examining the factors influencing knowledge management system adoption and continuance intention. Knowledge Management Research& Practice, 11(4), pp.389-404(2013).

DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2012.24

Google Scholar

[10] Sohn, Jong-Soo; Bae, Un-Bong; Chung, In-Jeong. Contents Recommendation Method Using Social Network Analysis. Wireless Personal Communications, 73(4), pp.1529-1546 (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s11277-013-1264-z

Google Scholar

[11] Li, Yung-Ming; Hsiao, Han-Wen; Lee, Yi-Lin. Recommending social network applications via social filtering mechanisms. Information Sciences, 239(8), pp.18-30(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.041

Google Scholar

[12] Coello, J. M. A.; Yuming, Y.; Tobar, C. M. A Memory-based Collaborative Filtering Algorithm for Recommending Semantic Web Services. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 11(2), pp.795-801(2013).

DOI: 10.1109/tla.2013.6533969

Google Scholar

[13] Sezaki, Naoto; Kise, Koichi. A System for Recommending Tags of Images Using Co-occurrence of Tags and Similar Images. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 94(12), pp.57-64 (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/ecj.10342

Google Scholar

[14] Holzinger, Andreas. Social Media Mining and Social Network Analysis: Emerging Research. Online Information Review, 38(1), pp.157-158(2014).

DOI: 10.1108/oir-08-2013-0200

Google Scholar

[15] Kim S, Hong J, Suh E. A diagnosis framework for identifying the current knowledge sharing activity status in a community of practice. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(18), pp.13093-13107(2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.092

Google Scholar

[16] Slingsby, Aidan; Beecham, Roger; Wood, Jo. Visual analysis of social networks in space and time using smartphone logs. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 9(6), pp.848-864 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.07.002

Google Scholar

[17] Bhat, Sajid Yousuf; Abulaish, Muhammad. Analysis and mining of online social networks: emerging trends and challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(6), pp.408-444 (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/widm.1105

Google Scholar