Composite Material Selection Using Multi Criteria Decision Making for Automobile Torsion Bar

Article Preview

Abstract:

Automotive components made from composite materials can result in significant weight savings over steel and Aluminum. The main purpose of this research is to study about the selection of suitable composite material for automobile torsion bar which possesses good strength to weight ratio and yield considerable weight savings. This paper involves identification of potential composite materials, selection of evaluation criteria, use of fuzzy theory to quantify criteria values under uncertainty and application of fuzzy Linguistics to evaluate and select the best material for replacing conventional steel material with composite material used in automobile torsion bar. The strength of the proposed paper is the ability to deal with uncertainty arising due to the lack of real data in material selection for replacing the conventional material. Keyw ords:- Composite material, Incomplete linguistic preference relations, AHP, Decision analysis, Consistent fuzzy preference relations, Multi-criteria decision making

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

649-654

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.T. Chen, C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Germany, Springer- Verlag, 1 (1992) 1-5.

Google Scholar

[2] T.L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leader: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA. (1988).

Google Scholar

[3] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1980).

Google Scholar

[4] I. Millet, P.T. Harker, Globally effective questioning in the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1990) 88-97.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90065-j

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kacprzyk, Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18 (1986) 105-118.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(86)90014-x

Google Scholar

[6] J. Fodor, M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modeling and Multi criteria Decision Support, Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1994).

Google Scholar

[7] E. Herrera-Viedma, E. Herrera, F. Chiclana, M. Luque, Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research, 154 (2004) 98-109.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00725-7

Google Scholar

[8] Z.S. Xu, Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion, Information Fusion, 7 (2006) 331-337.

DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] H.J. Zimmerman, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Taipei, Taiwan: Maw Chang Book Company, (1985).

Google Scholar

[10] C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, (1981).

Google Scholar

[11] n. s. el-tayeb, r. m. gadelrab, friction and wear properties of e-glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites under different sliding contact conditions, 1(1996) 112–117.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06770-1

Google Scholar

[12] m. akay, s. kong ah mun, a. stanley, influence of moisture on the thermal and mechanical properties of autoclaved and oven-cured kevlar-49/epoxy laminates, 57 (1997) 565–571.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(97)00017-1

Google Scholar

[13] d. d. edie , the effect of processing on the structure and properties of carbon fibers, 36 (1998) 345–362.

Google Scholar