Accuracy Comparison for the Ocean Tide Models in Estuarine Tidal Prediction, the Pearl River Estuary

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ocean tide models with satellite altimetry can simulate global ocean tides conveniently and accurately. However, it was not sure for them to have a same good performance in estuaties and coastal zones. To assess their accuracy in the Pearl River estuaries, tidal elevations were computed respectively by three models NAO.99b, OTPS and WWT, and compared with the hourly observed data. RMS misfits were calculated and the results suggest that the models are competent to demonstrate the basic time features of tides and the accuracy is not lower than that of traditional methods in some certain periods and areas. The models behave better in the mouth zones, especially in the open area outside, but in the upstreams have differences between dry season and flood season. At the entrances, compared with the river-dominated estuary, the models indicate more accurate estimations for the tide-dominated estuaries. WWT is recommended among these three models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2141-2145

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jing Peng , Qidong Peng. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 10: 78-82 (2005). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Shangwei Chen, Zhaosen Jin. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 6: 41-47 (1989). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Liju He , Qihua Li, Marine Forecasts, 8: 29-37(2009). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Yanchu Li, Dewei Xu, Hailin Ruan. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 8: 29-37 (2009). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Ling Yu, Guohong Fang. Advances in Marine Science, 4: 133-141(2010). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Biao Wang, Jianrong Zhu . Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 4: 17-27 (2012) (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Le Provost, C.; Vincent, P. Journal of Computational Physics, 8: 273-291 (1986).

Google Scholar

[8] Le Provost, C.; Bennett, A.F.; Cartwright, D.E. Science, 2: 639-642 (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] Dawei Li, Jiancheng Li, Taoyong Jin , and Minzhang Hu. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 8: 106-110(2012). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] A.J.E. Smith, O.B. Andersen. Progress in Oceanography, v40, 1-4: 325-336 (1997).

Google Scholar

[11] Brian K. Arbic, Chris Garrett. Continental Shelf Research, 4: 564-574 (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] Xinxuan Sun, Jun Xu , Jingyang Bao. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 7: 16-18 (2006). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Jing Hu, Rui Chen. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 7: 224-230 (2007). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Jingyang Bao , Dingbo Chao, Jian cheng Li. ACTA GEODAETICA ET CARTOGRAPHIC SINICA, 2: 17-23 (2000) (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Guojun Zhai, Motao Huang, Yongzhong Ouyang, et al. Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 01: 57-62 (2002). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] K. Matsumoto et al. Journal of Oceanography, v56: 567-581 (2000).

Google Scholar

[17] H. S. Fok, H. Baki Iz, C. K. Shum, et al. Evaluation of Ocean Tide Models Used for Jason-2 Altimetry Corrections. Marine Geodesy, Vol. 33, Iss. sup1 (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2010.491027

Google Scholar

[18] Paul J. Martin et al. Use of the Oregon State University Tidal Inversion Software (OTIS) to Generate Improved Tidal Prediction in the East-Asian Seas[R]. Ocean Dynamics and Prediction Branch Oceanography Division, 4 (2009).

DOI: 10.21236/ada499002

Google Scholar

[19] Gary D. Egbert, Svetlana Y. Erofeeva. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2: 183-204 (2002).

Google Scholar

[20] Chun Chu Li et al. Processes and evolution law of China Southern estuarine[M ]. BeiJing: Science Press: 8-11 (2004) (In Chinese).

Google Scholar