Comparative Experimental Research of Soil Freezing with Pressure and Non-Pressure

Article Preview

Abstract:

Use two kinds of soil, processes the uniaxial compressive strength test under the condition of pressure and zero pressure freeze, concludes different test results. That is the uniaxial compressive strength of frozen soil under pressure is higher than that without pressure, and laboratory test data as the basis for the design of the temporary support is relatively safe.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

48-51

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] 《Standard for Soil Test Method》GB/T 50123-1999, China Planning Press.

Google Scholar

[2] 《Test Method for the Triaxial Shear Strength of Artificial Frozen Soil》MT/T593. 5-(1996).

Google Scholar

[3] Qian chunchun, Tian yahu, Improvement on Experimental Method of Frost Heaving[J]. Low Temperature Construction Technology. 2007. (5)102-103.

Google Scholar

[4] Wang renhe, Li dongwei, Model Test of Multiple Circle Pipes Freezing and Mathematical Model Study of Water Heat Coupling [J] . Journal of Hefeiu University. 2007. (11)1481-1485.

Google Scholar

[5] Wang renhe, zhuang rui, Li dongwei, Frost Heaving Force Measurement Study in Formation and Melting of Multi Ring Pipe Frozen Wall [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology. 2010, 32(3): 538-542.

Google Scholar

[6] Tang yiqun, Hong jun, Experimental Study on Frost Heaving Characteristics of Mucky Clay under Artificial Freezing [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2009, 36(6): 359-365.

Google Scholar

[7] Peng liyun, Liu Jiankun, Tian yahu, Research on Frost Heaving Characteristics of Silty Clay [J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology. 2009, 36(6): 359-365.

Google Scholar

[8] Wang yansen, Li binsheng, Numerical Simulation Method of Temperature Field of Freezing Shaft Out- wall[J]. Mining and Engineering Safety Journal. 2007. (9)316-320.

Google Scholar